Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932404AbWC1V71 (ORCPT ); Tue, 28 Mar 2006 16:59:27 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S932403AbWC1V70 (ORCPT ); Tue, 28 Mar 2006 16:59:26 -0500 Received: from watts.utsl.gen.nz ([202.78.240.73]:48269 "EHLO watts.utsl.gen.nz") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932404AbWC1V7Z (ORCPT ); Tue, 28 Mar 2006 16:59:25 -0500 Subject: Re: [Devel] Re: [RFC] Virtualization steps From: Sam Vilain To: Kir Kolyshkin Cc: devel@openvz.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org In-Reply-To: <4428DB76.9040102@openvz.org> References: <44242A3F.1010307@sw.ru> <44242D4D.40702@yahoo.com.au> <1143228339.19152.91.camel@localhost.localdomain> <4428BB5C.3060803@tmr.com> <4428DB76.9040102@openvz.org> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Wed, 29 Mar 2006 09:59:38 +1200 Message-Id: <1143583179.6325.10.camel@localhost.localdomain> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.4.1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 567 Lines: 15 On Tue, 2006-03-28 at 10:45 +0400, Kir Kolyshkin wrote: > It is actually not a future goal, but rather a reality. Since os-level > virtualization overhead is very low (1-2 per cent or so), one can run > hundreds of VEs. Huh? You managed to measure it!? Or do you just mean "negligible" by "1-2 per cent" ? :-) Sam. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/