Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Thu, 25 Oct 2001 11:20:31 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Thu, 25 Oct 2001 11:20:20 -0400 Received: from nycsmtp3fa.rdc-nyc.rr.com ([24.29.99.79]:15118 "EHLO nyc.rr.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Thu, 25 Oct 2001 11:20:08 -0400 Message-ID: <3BD82DC0.7697B1AF@nyc.rr.com> Date: Thu, 25 Oct 2001 11:20:32 -0400 From: John Weber Organization: WorldWideWeber X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.78 [en] (X11; U; Linux 2.4.13 i686) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: kernel compiler Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org David Weinehall wrote: > > On Thu, Oct 25, 2001 at 10:31:08AM -0400, Frontgate Lab wrote: > > Just out of a need to know things :) > > > > What compiler do Alan Cox and Linus use to create the 2.4 series > > kernels? > > > > I am currently using RedHat's compiler gcc-2.96-85 and have been told > > not to do so because it "breaks things" . > > This is likely due to the fact that some people are still living with > the misconception that all gcc-2.96 releases are buggy. They are not; > only early versions are. > > gcc-2.95.[34] and gcc-2.96-(newer versions) are viable choices if you > want a working kernel. Some other versions might work, but then again, > > At the moment, gcc3 doesn't work too well with the kernel, and you won't > get any large benefit. > I use gcc3 to compile anything and everything I need. With the exception of "multi-line literal complaints", my kernel compiles fine. Is there anything that I should know? - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/