Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932470AbWC1Wgh (ORCPT ); Tue, 28 Mar 2006 17:36:37 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S932468AbWC1Wgg (ORCPT ); Tue, 28 Mar 2006 17:36:36 -0500 Received: from e5.ny.us.ibm.com ([32.97.182.145]:48294 "EHLO e5.ny.us.ibm.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932464AbWC1Wgg (ORCPT ); Tue, 28 Mar 2006 17:36:36 -0500 Date: Tue, 28 Mar 2006 16:36:23 -0600 To: tsbogend@alpha.franken.de, donf@us.ibm.com Cc: jklewis@us.bm.com, linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org Subject: [PATCH] Janitor: drivers/net/pcnet32: fix incorrect comments Message-ID: <20060328223623.GD2172@austin.ibm.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i From: linas@austin.ibm.com (Linas Vepstas) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1663 Lines: 39 Please sign-off/ack/apply and/or forward upstream. [PATCH] Janitor: drivers/net/pcnet32: fix incorrect comments The comments concerning how the pcnet32 ethernet device driver selects the MAC addr to use are incorrect. A recent patch (in the last 3 months) changed how the code worked, but did not change the comments. Side comment: the new behaviour is good; I've got a pcnet32 card which powers up with garbage in the CSR's, and a good MAC addr in the PROM. Signed-off-by: Linas Vepstas ---- drivers/net/pcnet32.c | 4 ++-- 1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) Index: linux-2.6.16-git6/drivers/net/pcnet32.c =================================================================== --- linux-2.6.16-git6.orig/drivers/net/pcnet32.c 2006-03-23 12:21:41.000000000 -0600 +++ linux-2.6.16-git6/drivers/net/pcnet32.c 2006-03-28 16:08:23.398158717 -0600 @@ -1167,8 +1167,8 @@ pcnet32_probe1(unsigned long ioaddr, int * station address PROM at the base address and programmed into the * "Physical Address Registers" CSR12-14. * As a precautionary measure, we read the PROM values and complain if - * they disagree with the CSRs. Either way, we use the CSR values, and - * double check that they are valid. + * they disagree with the CSRs. If they miscompare, and the PROM addr + * is valid, then the PROM addr is used. */ for (i = 0; i < 3; i++) { unsigned int val; - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/