Subject: Re: [Devel] Re: [RFC] Virtualization steps
From: Sam Vilain <sam@vilain.net>
To: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@xmission.com>
Cc: Jun OKAJIMA <okajima@digitalinfra.co.jp>, devel@openvz.org, akpm@osdl.org,
       Nick Piggin <nickpiggin@yahoo.com.au>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
       Alexey Kuznetsov <kuznet@ms2.inr.ac.ru>, serue@us.ibm.com,
       herbert@13thfloor.at
In-Reply-To: <m1ek0mme5y.fsf@ebiederm.dsl.xmission.com>
References: <4429A17D.2050506@openvz.org>
	 <200603282138.AA00929@bbb-jz5c7z9hn9y.digitalinfra.co.jp>
	 <m1ek0mme5y.fsf@ebiederm.dsl.xmission.com>
Content-Type: text/plain
Date: Wed, 29 Mar 2006 11:18:05 +1200
Message-Id: <1143587886.6325.64.camel@localhost.localdomain>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Content-Length: 753
Lines: 21

On Tue, 2006-03-28 at 14:51 -0700, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
> Jun OKAJIMA <okajima@digitalinfra.co.jp> writes:
> 
> > Probably, the biggest problem for now is, Xen patch conflicts with
> > Vserver/OpenVZ patch.
> 
> The implementations are significantly different enough that I don't
> see Xen and any jail patch really conflicting.  There might be some
> trivial conflicts in /proc but even that seems unlikely.

This has been done before,

http://list.linux-vserver.org/archive/vserver/msg10235.html

Sam.

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/