Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Thu, 25 Oct 2001 11:38:31 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Thu, 25 Oct 2001 11:38:20 -0400 Received: from lightning.swansea.linux.org.uk ([194.168.151.1]:52240 "EHLO the-village.bc.nu") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Thu, 25 Oct 2001 11:38:03 -0400 Subject: Re: kernel compiler To: weber@nyc.rr.com (John Weber) Date: Thu, 25 Oct 2001 16:45:03 +0100 (BST) Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org In-Reply-To: <3BD82DC0.7697B1AF@nyc.rr.com> from "John Weber" at Oct 25, 2001 11:20:32 AM X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.5 PL6] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: From: Alan Cox Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org > > At the moment, gcc3 doesn't work too well with the kernel, and you won't > > get any large benefit. > > I use gcc3 to compile anything and everything I need. With the > exception of "multi-line literal complaints", my kernel compiles fine. > > Is there anything that I should know? Mostly that gcc 3.0 generally produces slower code. I've had a couple of noticed glitches with -ac but those have workarounds in the tree now - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/