Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Thu, 25 Oct 2001 11:44:40 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Thu, 25 Oct 2001 11:44:31 -0400 Received: from geos.coastside.net ([207.213.212.4]:3003 "EHLO geos.coastside.net") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Thu, 25 Oct 2001 11:44:23 -0400 Mime-Version: 1.0 Message-Id: In-Reply-To: <9r9asg$7jr$1@ncc1701.cistron.net> In-Reply-To: <9r8icv$ukh$1@ncc1701.cistron.net> <20011025082001.B764@hq2> <9r9asg$7jr$1@ncc1701.cistron.net> Date: Thu, 25 Oct 2001 08:44:09 -0700 To: "Rob Turk" , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org From: Jonathan Lundell Subject: Re: [RFC] New Driver Model for 2.5 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" ; format="flowed" Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org At 5:22 PM +0200 10/25/01, Rob Turk wrote: > > I'm failing to imagine a good case for suspending a system that has a >> tape drive on it. >> > >Well, maybe the tape example wasn't all that good. The state information >(wide/sync negotiation) still needs to be retained for all SCSI >devices though. Any driver that uses SCSI bus reset for last-resort error recovery (and I think it's pretty typical) needs to be able to renegotiate the connection. Maybe even after a SCSI device reset; I don't recall. So initiating that negotiation as part of (or after) resume doesn't seem all that burdensome. You need that anyway for "deep sleep" that powers down devices completely. -- /Jonathan Lundell. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/