Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1750728AbWC2NUX (ORCPT ); Wed, 29 Mar 2006 08:20:23 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751111AbWC2NUX (ORCPT ); Wed, 29 Mar 2006 08:20:23 -0500 Received: from mraos.ra.phy.cam.ac.uk ([131.111.48.8]:47836 "EHLO mraos.ra.phy.cam.ac.uk") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750728AbWC2NUW (ORCPT ); Wed, 29 Mar 2006 08:20:22 -0500 To: Jens Axboe cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [cfq] sched_idle process stalled for 1 minute; strange ioprio too In-Reply-To: Your message of "Mon, 27 Mar 2006 10:49:36 +0200." <20060327084936.GF8186@suse.de> Date: Wed, 29 Mar 2006 14:20:20 +0100 From: Sanjoy Mahajan Message-Id: Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 738 Lines: 14 > Are you sure no other disk activity was going on at that time? Just > a single writeout or read from the disk will stall your idle prio > task. If you expect things to finish within a bounded time, then you > should not use idle :-) I'm not 100% sure. The disk light never flashed. And if any write or read happened it would have been for just a moment, whereas the apt-get stalled for about one minute. I'll experiment again at the next big 'apt-get upgrade' and report any long stalls. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/