Received: by 2002:a05:6902:102b:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id x11csp2967838ybt; Mon, 29 Jun 2020 11:42:29 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwYuk2I29SLKT/L5lpPtoy9wWcIiFB4WVvuevvh3Kc1tKYUh71mYhwNzIkNB7EctuZwct3W X-Received: by 2002:a17:906:35cd:: with SMTP id p13mr15107646ejb.172.1593456149350; Mon, 29 Jun 2020 11:42:29 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1593456149; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=i3Qg2zD/Y8xKir1W1XWUQGQoNMYggghhil7z2axETEJS84iQYnUrMqvg3aFTJHuGnC xWptZZ1XlaIZuJj8YbPDfI1szym7/MHV+QjGRw60yiUpUjrKJR7yuDqkJV/dMUUNwzIu afiQdsS51YGjDgvg0uubyZrmSCH6IrCotjTWzrbbcg/PnOXoapFRHZZxBMwL402jrnh+ sAlEFqh/WP2mk3kZL0zioo1658p1LoGy8+nBKoyYUfzz8NbCFhAIpg2rQluWc9kkDoHy HhF0ath9q/aU73e2spPwu4Xsm3lYr1YO6jQcaE5vp8T+qBBbzv5EpQ8dYYyQ4WM8FNIB p/Yw== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:in-reply-to:content-disposition :mime-version:references:message-id:subject:cc:to:from:date; bh=zK8ruQgEIt+dmvt+CyM4IjZANXxZjqMu3gMCBuaxmAk=; b=gGOP4CcuFYHrVVAFVFg3ZCwiLpKC02OIJtva6/u+/D1HtoVdRaQIzJuJDFumUtP4BB p7Egt89CEbzR5sDZDbBp/M+KNgmOHIOe6pPENDzX43AuOp/DW/RQzmX6g6y6V/dE8yYi yrtdBGfypoURPGuenkWNee+wycucnOTCLhVOcr2+0MxGEcON3O/ALtP+bE1XHZHDtlq9 tHPACcBrfTyx5s85+k05nqtWo5T4Vlau+BdguCQHIQaHKW44BAnmzsAi0ufInEf92fBg Emp0baaEZRTWRgbpMYQ9FPj3Ap80MSL9q9GhT6woCJtt6E28mcZNZiiofG0LP3If4Pt0 PMqw== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=ibm.com Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [23.128.96.18]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id gz11si287953ejb.409.2020.06.29.11.42.06; Mon, 29 Jun 2020 11:42:29 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=ibm.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726128AbgF2Sld (ORCPT + 99 others); Mon, 29 Jun 2020 14:41:33 -0400 Received: from mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com ([148.163.156.1]:58072 "EHLO mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1728930AbgF2Sl0 (ORCPT ); Mon, 29 Jun 2020 14:41:26 -0400 Received: from pps.filterd (m0187473.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com (8.16.0.42/8.16.0.42) with SMTP id 05TC3mjr080192; Mon, 29 Jun 2020 08:07:39 -0400 Received: from pps.reinject (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com with ESMTP id 31x1rupwev-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Mon, 29 Jun 2020 08:07:38 -0400 Received: from m0187473.ppops.net (m0187473.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by pps.reinject (8.16.0.36/8.16.0.36) with SMTP id 05TC4HMe081091; Mon, 29 Jun 2020 08:07:36 -0400 Received: from ppma06ams.nl.ibm.com (66.31.33a9.ip4.static.sl-reverse.com [169.51.49.102]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com with ESMTP id 31x1rupw9r-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Mon, 29 Jun 2020 08:07:36 -0400 Received: from pps.filterd (ppma06ams.nl.ibm.com [127.0.0.1]) by ppma06ams.nl.ibm.com (8.16.0.42/8.16.0.42) with SMTP id 05TC2658008359; Mon, 29 Jun 2020 12:07:28 GMT Received: from b06avi18878370.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (b06avi18878370.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com [9.149.26.194]) by ppma06ams.nl.ibm.com with ESMTP id 31wwch2637-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Mon, 29 Jun 2020 12:07:28 +0000 Received: from d06av22.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (d06av22.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com [9.149.105.58]) by b06avi18878370.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (8.14.9/8.14.9/NCO v10.0) with ESMTP id 05TC7PkX21823872 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=OK); Mon, 29 Jun 2020 12:07:25 GMT Received: from d06av22.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id B7EB74C050; Mon, 29 Jun 2020 12:07:25 +0000 (GMT) Received: from d06av22.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5E3314C063; Mon, 29 Jun 2020 12:07:25 +0000 (GMT) Received: from osiris (unknown [9.171.82.53]) by d06av22.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS; Mon, 29 Jun 2020 12:07:25 +0000 (GMT) Date: Mon, 29 Jun 2020 14:07:23 +0200 From: Heiko Carstens To: David Hildenbrand Cc: Gerald Schaefer , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, Vasily Gorbik , Christian Borntraeger , Andrew Morton Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC] s390x/vmem: get rid of memory segment list Message-ID: <20200629120723.GD4468@osiris> References: <20200625150029.45019-1-david@redhat.com> <20200626192253.2281d95d@thinkpad> <20200626204621.55248f99@thinkpad> <20200629115537.GC4468@osiris> <0c783dbb-630c-6440-74b8-8b40af146d6a@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <0c783dbb-630c-6440-74b8-8b40af146d6a@redhat.com> X-TM-AS-GCONF: 00 X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10434:6.0.216,18.0.687 definitions=2020-06-29_11:2020-06-29,2020-06-29 signatures=0 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=outbound_notspam policy=outbound score=0 priorityscore=1501 cotscore=-2147483648 lowpriorityscore=0 phishscore=0 spamscore=0 bulkscore=0 adultscore=0 mlxlogscore=999 suspectscore=1 clxscore=1015 malwarescore=0 mlxscore=0 impostorscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.12.0-2004280000 definitions=main-2006290087 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, Jun 29, 2020 at 02:01:22PM +0200, David Hildenbrand wrote: > On 29.06.20 13:55, Heiko Carstens wrote: > > On Fri, Jun 26, 2020 at 08:46:21PM +0200, Gerald Schaefer wrote: > >> Verified with DCSS overlapping boot and standby memory, works fine. > >> As expected, the error message changes, but I don't think that is a > >> problem, as long as you also remove the old -ENOSPC case / comment > >> in arch/s390/mm/extmem.c. It is actually more correct now I guess, > >> -ENOSPC doesn't look like the correct return value anyway. > >> > >> Thanks for cleaning up! Looks good to me, and removes > 100 LOC, > >> unless Heiko remembers some other issues from ancient times. > >> > >> Reviewed-by: Gerald Schaefer > >> Tested-by: Gerald Schaefer [DCSS] > > > > Looks good to me too. Gerald, thanks for looking and verifying this, > > and David, thanks for providing the patch. > > > > Applied. > > > > Thanks Gerald and Heiko! Should I send an addon patch to tweak the > documentation or resend this patch? Please send an addon patch. I will merge it.