Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18;
Date:   Mon, 29 Jun 2020 09:31:21 -0700
From:   Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>
To:     Drew Fustini <drew@beagleboard.org>
Cc:     Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>, linux-omap@vger.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org,
        linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
        Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>,
        Haojian Zhuang <haojian.zhuang@linaro.org>,
        devicetree@vger.kernel.org, bcousson@baylibre.com,
        Jason Kridner <jkridner@beagleboard.org>,
        Robert Nelson <robertcnelson@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 0/3] pinctrl: single: support #pinctrl-cells = 2
Message-ID: <20200629163121.GS37466@atomide.com>
References: <20200622172951.524306-1-drew@beagleboard.org>
 <20200629122858.GA506802@x1>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20200629122858.GA506802@x1>
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

* Drew Fustini <drew@beagleboard.org> [200629 12:29]:
> Hi Tony - do you think this series is useful as-is?
> 
> Or do you want to see some usage of the seperate conf and mux values
> first?

Hmm to me it seems you should squash patches 2 and 3 together as
otherwise git bisect will fail to boot probably at patch 2.

Regards,

Tony