Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1750924AbWC2R6v (ORCPT ); Wed, 29 Mar 2006 12:58:51 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1750926AbWC2R6v (ORCPT ); Wed, 29 Mar 2006 12:58:51 -0500 Received: from zrtps0kn.nortel.com ([47.140.192.55]:17044 "EHLO zrtps0kn.nortel.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750924AbWC2R6v (ORCPT ); Wed, 29 Mar 2006 12:58:51 -0500 Message-ID: <442ACAD6.6@nortel.com> Date: Wed, 29 Mar 2006 11:58:46 -0600 From: "Christopher Friesen" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.6) Gecko/20040115 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: CONFIG_FRAME_POINTER and module vermagic Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-OriginalArrivalTime: 29 Mar 2006 17:58:48.0074 (UTC) FILETIME=[6DC9C6A0:01C6535A] Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 536 Lines: 15 I've had a case reported to me of someone loading a module without frame pointers into kernel compiled with frame pointers enabled. 1) Is this allowed? I didn't think so, but I wanted to double check. 2) If not, would it make sense to include this in the module vermagic? Thanks, Chris - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/