Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751194AbWC2Wx7 (ORCPT ); Wed, 29 Mar 2006 17:53:59 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751165AbWC2Wxd (ORCPT ); Wed, 29 Mar 2006 17:53:33 -0500 Received: from cantor2.suse.de ([195.135.220.15]:1516 "EHLO mx2.suse.de") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751177AbWC2Wxa (ORCPT ); Wed, 29 Mar 2006 17:53:30 -0500 From: Andi Kleen To: Andrew Morton Subject: Re: dcache leak in 2.6.16-git8 II Date: Thu, 30 Mar 2006 00:53:24 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.1 Cc: bharata@in.ibm.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org References: <200603270750.28174.ak@suse.de> <200603300026.59131.ak@suse.de> <20060329145013.37c87323.akpm@osdl.org> In-Reply-To: <20060329145013.37c87323.akpm@osdl.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200603300053.25235.ak@suse.de> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 678 Lines: 20 On Thursday 30 March 2006 00:50, Andrew Morton wrote: > It looks that way. Didn't someone else report a sock_inode_cache leak? Didn't see it. > > I still got a copy of the /proc in case anybody wants more information. > > We have this fancy new /proc/slab_allocators now, it might show something > interesting. It needs CONFIG_DEBUG_SLAB_LEAK. I didn't have that enabled unfortunately. I can try it on the next round. -Andi - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/