Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751254AbWC2X1N (ORCPT ); Wed, 29 Mar 2006 18:27:13 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751261AbWC2X0x (ORCPT ); Wed, 29 Mar 2006 18:26:53 -0500 Received: from 216-99-217-87.dsl.aracnet.com ([216.99.217.87]:24706 "EHLO sorel.sous-sol.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751254AbWC2X0n (ORCPT ); Wed, 29 Mar 2006 18:26:43 -0500 Date: Wed, 29 Mar 2006 15:28:06 -0800 From: Chris Wright To: Sam Vilain Cc: Chris Wright , Linux Kernel ML Subject: Re: [RFC] Virtualization steps Message-ID: <20060329232806.GQ15997@sorel.sous-sol.org> References: <20060328142639.GE14576@MAIL.13thfloor.at> <44294BE4.2030409@yahoo.com.au> <442A26E9.20608@vilain.net> <20060329182027.GB14724@sorel.sous-sol.org> <442B0BFE.9080709@vilain.net> <20060329225241.GO15997@sorel.sous-sol.org> <442B11CC.6040503@vilain.net> <20060329231315.GP15997@sorel.sous-sol.org> <442B15AA.4070703@vilain.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <442B15AA.4070703@vilain.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 633 Lines: 14 * Sam Vilain (sam@vilain.net) wrote: > Yes, certainly. Providing the features to the users in a different way > is a pragmatic alternative to trying to make sure the contained system > gets to use all the same kernel API calls it could without the > virtualisation. The only people who won't like that is are people > consolidating, so they still have to use Xen. Works for me ;-) -chris - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/