Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18;
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <20200521162518.1809995-1-lma@semihalf.com> <3c89e614-81f5-ba87-19a9-fbe9f5c73925@linux.intel.com>
 <CAFJ_xbr8TN3ynfELJ3NQnkuRg0VRbkjB7=Cyb8yu2L==JGXJiw@mail.gmail.com>
 <475fb5c0-9b26-a8f6-c102-25c7775bc2ca@linux.intel.com> <CAFJ_xbq-QotvPG=AxSp7=Etc5P5f4ePRWLCvSNnTkzUO9o_qjQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <268b11b6-9f4c-d769-a7f9-536d77198705@linux.intel.com>
In-Reply-To: <268b11b6-9f4c-d769-a7f9-536d77198705@linux.intel.com>
From:   =?UTF-8?Q?=C5=81ukasz_Majczak?= <lma@semihalf.com>
Date:   Mon, 29 Jun 2020 13:11:15 +0200
Message-ID: <CAFJ_xboUTDtnpvskb2dY4fGhGLNkEgT0sH3dU0NYJV_Cb_gqPw@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] ASoC: Intel: kbl_rt5663_rt5514_max98927: Split
 be_hw_params_fixup function
To:     Harsha Priya <harshapriya.n@intel.com>
Cc:     alsa-devel@alsa-project.org,
        Pierre-Louis Bossart <pierre-louis.bossart@linux.intel.com>,
        Jie Yang <yang.jie@linux.intel.com>,
        Radoslaw Biernacki <rad@semihalf.com>,
        Ross Zwisler <zwisler@google.com>,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
        Liam Girdwood <liam.r.girdwood@linux.intel.com>,
        Bob Brandt <brndt@google.com>, Marcin Wojtas <mw@semihalf.com>,
        Alex Levin <levinale@chromium.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

Hi Harsha,

We would like to continue the work on this, could you please suggest
the correct approach.

Best regards,
Lukasz

czw., 21 maj 2020 o 20:10 Pierre-Louis Bossart
<pierre-louis.bossart@linux.intel.com> napisa=C5=82(a):
>
>
>
> On 5/21/20 12:30 PM, =C5=81ukasz Majczak wrote:
> > Hi Pierre
> >
> > If you will take a look at the original kabylake_ssp_fixup() you will
> > see that it is checking whether the related FE is "Kbl Audio Port",
> > "Kbl Audio Headset Playback", "Kbl Audio Capture Port" or "Kbl Audio
> > DMIC cap" - then for the first 3 cases it sets min/max channels to 2
> > while for the "Kbl DMIC cap" it can be 2 or 4, that's is why I'm
> > trying to split this, but maybe I'm missing here something.
>
> I don't understand this code either.
>
> I believe the intent is that for all SSP1-RT5663 usages, we should use
>
>                 rate->min =3D rate->max =3D 48000;
>                 chan->min =3D chan->max =3D 2;
>                 snd_mask_none(fmt);
>                 snd_mask_set_format(fmt, SNDRV_PCM_FORMAT_S24_LE);
>
> That is pretty easy to move to a dedicated ssp1 fixup.
>
> for SSP0, we have RT5514 for capture and max98927 for playback, but the
> existing code does not explicitly deal with rate/channels/format for all
> cases, so it's not clear what should happen.
>
> Harsha, can you help here?
>
> >
> > Best regards,
> > Lukasz
> >
> > czw., 21 maj 2020 o 19:17 Pierre-Louis Bossart
> > <pierre-louis.bossart@linux.intel.com> napisa=C5=82(a):
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> On 5/21/20 12:08 PM, =C5=81ukasz Majczak wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>> don't add a new dailink, this is not right.
> >>>>
> >>> Can you advise a better solution how to assign different fixup
> >>> functions to mic and to speakers? I was looking at "dmic01" dailink i=
n
> >>> skl_nau88l25_max98357a.c as an example.
> >>
> >> I am not sure I follow. the DMICs are handled on a shared SSP, so how
> >> would one set a different fixup? The word length have to be the same.