Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18;
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <20200625140105.14999-1-TheSven73@gmail.com> <20200625140105.14999-2-TheSven73@gmail.com>
 <CAOMZO5AWiHWSLAcd=dj9dDFj8jLPAVAuoiOAJ8qKGPwRq1Q41g@mail.gmail.com> <CAGngYiXJy4ASTNfT+R+qzJ3wA=Wy2h6XZm+8oo09sD+Jmse02w@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAGngYiXJy4ASTNfT+R+qzJ3wA=Wy2h6XZm+8oo09sD+Jmse02w@mail.gmail.com>
From:   Fabio Estevam <festevam@gmail.com>
Date:   Mon, 29 Jun 2020 11:04:09 -0300
Message-ID: <CAOMZO5BgKNKceJmvX+ayeB_z9YWMcJMJmOX7Uf81HTeZ-t7_fQ@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 2/2] ARM: imx6plus: enable internal routing of
 clk_enet_ref where possible
To:     Sven Van Asbroeck <thesven73@gmail.com>
Cc:     Shawn Guo <shawnguo@kernel.org>, Fugang Duan <fugang.duan@nxp.com>,
        Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@pengutronix.de>,
        Pengutronix Kernel Team <kernel@pengutronix.de>,
        NXP Linux Team <linux-imx@nxp.com>,
        "moderated list:ARM/FREESCALE IMX / MXC ARM ARCHITECTURE" 
        <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
        linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

Hi Sven,

On Mon, Jun 29, 2020 at 10:40 AM Sven Van Asbroeck <thesven73@gmail.com> wrote:

> I'm sure you've checked that sabresd ethernet works ok on mainline
> even without this patch?

Yes, I have tested several times: without this patch series, DHCP works fine.

Applying this series causes DHCP to fail. The test is 100% reproducible.

Cheers