Received: by 2002:a05:6902:102b:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id x11csp3074067ybt; Mon, 29 Jun 2020 14:37:27 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJy6SuJGeonJ4hSxa6yUwxva8Xzy/7l+thylr893U2eh2+kilCcgT9Xy8aQIMkB4dAalA5Zw X-Received: by 2002:a17:906:c150:: with SMTP id dp16mr15421932ejc.536.1593466647245; Mon, 29 Jun 2020 14:37:27 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1593466647; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=gr9GS60JsYKO9mrEepBKswS1F195Fb2XhWwlgMS3+fmGz6J7rVyEj5sTPdGlmG7Xf+ xSCZXA7TCZU+R53Jy79IBnZXhiewVUvckqnoYj+GuI9NRLmJy2fQilHs21OoTsKqV6YQ BrwykpGBfs3uHsfT+6PpnVG49VMgMM4NTjR48KLiCL9yGUJfeB4GGQR60uhfI8eK89FI FZnpli2pCykdKw30pu/27b3fiTOq5h7yvhk0h47C+bCgj4kyyYAIA6z0M/2d8uF5dDYi RoBh/cKrPcspW3lL3aWjEp2aUhwdovRYDHEPFJCbdinShB//L6b0XwmSNgUZ1nix9O4B u6BA== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:in-reply-to:content-disposition :mime-version:references:message-id:subject:cc:to:from:date; bh=Q53ij88Ujok02wPK67fsfTYnG01/6ADGZ+BklKESD9I=; b=dA3AsIl/BFTWhwmlcCaRL5tL1op6rG9bb8pS5aKSN6z5N5mMd3zNWptmvOf2GCz3gY 3pJp9Mo7z1LCTx/IUdlxtedDMxbhhVV3RY8qxL6chLwt4zxjAWUdFAag3cvhpkkSyFb4 ZQGCBK/4EwXyXP6bEvi7Ni45X7BG8prgy0QnLb3VNPGKPR1b8muDonMiqFk1JqtxazM5 A50RBXlk0+PZYu4Qlng1a3ndKMyjfs+UrN1Orp0q5rZF3gi7r43MA9a/MOvvrORkUaJi mWRGQ20IyZI4FQs7Br68wwWBf/dBh4PGuMgQKR5Zq8wCLBvgUt0gl+Tz5ivThfciZVeZ F6Jg== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=ibm.com Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [23.128.96.18]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id a13si430061edn.461.2020.06.29.14.37.04; Mon, 29 Jun 2020 14:37:27 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=ibm.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1728454AbgF2Skl (ORCPT + 99 others); Mon, 29 Jun 2020 14:40:41 -0400 Received: from mx0b-001b2d01.pphosted.com ([148.163.158.5]:32858 "EHLO mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1728265AbgF2Ska (ORCPT ); Mon, 29 Jun 2020 14:40:30 -0400 Received: from pps.filterd (m0098419.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by mx0b-001b2d01.pphosted.com (8.16.0.42/8.16.0.42) with SMTP id 05TBV0g4163526; Mon, 29 Jun 2020 07:55:44 -0400 Received: from pps.reinject (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mx0b-001b2d01.pphosted.com with ESMTP id 31ycg2fm0j-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Mon, 29 Jun 2020 07:55:44 -0400 Received: from m0098419.ppops.net (m0098419.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by pps.reinject (8.16.0.36/8.16.0.36) with SMTP id 05TBV3eg163827; Mon, 29 Jun 2020 07:55:44 -0400 Received: from ppma02fra.de.ibm.com (47.49.7a9f.ip4.static.sl-reverse.com [159.122.73.71]) by mx0b-001b2d01.pphosted.com with ESMTP id 31ycg2fkyv-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Mon, 29 Jun 2020 07:55:43 -0400 Received: from pps.filterd (ppma02fra.de.ibm.com [127.0.0.1]) by ppma02fra.de.ibm.com (8.16.0.42/8.16.0.42) with SMTP id 05TBnns1002935; Mon, 29 Jun 2020 11:55:42 GMT Received: from b06avi18626390.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (b06avi18626390.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com [9.149.26.192]) by ppma02fra.de.ibm.com with ESMTP id 31wwr7s31h-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Mon, 29 Jun 2020 11:55:42 +0000 Received: from d06av24.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (d06av24.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com [9.149.105.60]) by b06avi18626390.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (8.14.9/8.14.9/NCO v10.0) with ESMTP id 05TBsJVs590576 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=OK); Mon, 29 Jun 2020 11:54:19 GMT Received: from d06av24.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id 393B142049; Mon, 29 Jun 2020 11:55:39 +0000 (GMT) Received: from d06av24.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id CEB1742045; Mon, 29 Jun 2020 11:55:38 +0000 (GMT) Received: from osiris (unknown [9.171.82.53]) by d06av24.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS; Mon, 29 Jun 2020 11:55:38 +0000 (GMT) Date: Mon, 29 Jun 2020 13:55:37 +0200 From: Heiko Carstens To: Gerald Schaefer Cc: David Hildenbrand , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, Vasily Gorbik , Christian Borntraeger , Andrew Morton Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC] s390x/vmem: get rid of memory segment list Message-ID: <20200629115537.GC4468@osiris> References: <20200625150029.45019-1-david@redhat.com> <20200626192253.2281d95d@thinkpad> <20200626204621.55248f99@thinkpad> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20200626204621.55248f99@thinkpad> X-TM-AS-GCONF: 00 X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10434:6.0.216,18.0.687 definitions=2020-06-29_11:2020-06-29,2020-06-29 signatures=0 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=outbound_notspam policy=outbound score=0 mlxscore=0 bulkscore=0 mlxlogscore=999 priorityscore=1501 suspectscore=1 clxscore=1015 adultscore=0 malwarescore=0 cotscore=-2147483648 spamscore=0 impostorscore=0 lowpriorityscore=0 phishscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.12.0-2004280000 definitions=main-2006290079 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, Jun 26, 2020 at 08:46:21PM +0200, Gerald Schaefer wrote: > Verified with DCSS overlapping boot and standby memory, works fine. > As expected, the error message changes, but I don't think that is a > problem, as long as you also remove the old -ENOSPC case / comment > in arch/s390/mm/extmem.c. It is actually more correct now I guess, > -ENOSPC doesn't look like the correct return value anyway. > > Thanks for cleaning up! Looks good to me, and removes > 100 LOC, > unless Heiko remembers some other issues from ancient times. > > Reviewed-by: Gerald Schaefer > Tested-by: Gerald Schaefer [DCSS] Looks good to me too. Gerald, thanks for looking and verifying this, and David, thanks for providing the patch. Applied.