Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18;
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <20200629211801.C3D7095C0900@us180.sjc.aristanetworks.com> <20200629171612.49efbdaa@kicinski-fedora-pc1c0hjn.dhcp.thefacebook.com>
In-Reply-To: <20200629171612.49efbdaa@kicinski-fedora-pc1c0hjn.dhcp.thefacebook.com>
From:   Francesco Ruggeri <fruggeri@arista.com>
Date:   Mon, 29 Jun 2020 21:50:59 -0700
Message-ID: <CA+HUmGjHQPUh1frfy5E28Om9WTVr0W+UQVDsm99beC_mbTeMog@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] igb: reinit_locked() should be called with rtnl_lock
To:     Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
Cc:     open list <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        netdev <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
        intel-wired-lan@lists.osuosl.org,
        David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>,
        Jeff Kirsher <jeffrey.t.kirsher@intel.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

> Would you mind adding a fixes tag here? Probably:
>
> Fixes: 9d5c824399de ("igb: PCI-Express 82575 Gigabit Ethernet driver")

That seems to be the commit that introduced the driver in 2.6.25.
I am not familiar with the history of the driver to tell if this was a day 1
problem or if it became an issue later.

>
> And as a matter of fact it looks like e1000e and e1000 have the same
> bug :/ Would you mind checking all Intel driver producing matches for
> all the affected ones?

Do you mean identify all Intel drivers that may have the same issue?

Francesco