Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Sun, 12 Nov 2000 19:44:06 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Sun, 12 Nov 2000 19:43:56 -0500 Received: from draco.cus.cam.ac.uk ([131.111.8.18]:33195 "EHLO draco.cus.cam.ac.uk") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Sun, 12 Nov 2000 19:43:46 -0500 Message-Id: <5.0.0.25.2.20001113002439.0572d070@pop.cus.cam.ac.uk> X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 5.0 Date: Mon, 13 Nov 2000 00:43:44 +0000 To: Alan.Cox@linux.org From: Anton Altaparmakov Subject: Linux-2.2.x-BUG(?) memmory not detected Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi, Just noticed that both 2.2.18pre21 and RedHat-7.0-patched-2.2.16 kernels only detect 64Mb out of 192Mb RAM on my Dual Celeron/Intel 440GX chipset based workstation. - I haven't tried any other 2.2 kernels on that particular PC so maybe this is a general 2.2.x thing. The setup is one 64Mb SDRAM and one 128Mb SDRAM so it would seem that the 128Mb one is not detected at all. All 2.3/2.4 kernels I have tried have always detected the full 192Mb RAM. Is this a known feature or a bug? - If I can supply any more info to help track this down just let me know what you want to know and I will be happy to obtain the information from this PC... Regards, Anton -- "Education is what remains after one has forgotten everything he learned in school." - Albert Einstein -- Anton Altaparmakov Christ's College eMail: AntonA@bigfoot.com / aia21@cam.ac.uk Cambridge CB2 3BU ICQ: 8561279 United Kingdom WWW: http://www-stu.christs.cam.ac.uk/~aia21/ - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/