Received: by 2002:a05:6902:102b:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id x11csp3620542ybt; Tue, 30 Jun 2020 07:27:34 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJx+rJP9JXdNoPjPshYumNIh2X0v7A2z3z3XbLmlhvH498xM1XHSe7qn0B8ljlKpwgfmIY4+ X-Received: by 2002:aa7:d049:: with SMTP id n9mr16209351edo.39.1593527253868; Tue, 30 Jun 2020 07:27:33 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1593527253; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=LSo1PITTscPpxslZt+guYDr4Sv5rSGm6MErgmNtZy4xTMMkPQ6XdFVyyZsKr9wzxs7 IMxzXgjBagUxNE/UpCqH6bPvJEmVFz50Ep9hYdDZ5SEoS0TkQgqz8Zv72bPLNcJtsuMk XeEtnXTCaFd/fCTqazi/Jupu8g4dSZ6aqu5oveSFrDNTelk+1qjvY0ralHk2pC7ey+Rq NUMZjTlqJbb+ifYT9e5hWa7RSYmclBAjcyexI3ZZc0NkpeL85j/a3ZAM26w8t1O6JpQD l0D0PYnjginkSha1B9bQbQlcbl5smSvIPxp8kJNcpb2rHT0rzLA/FG4S4l6Oq37Ot1DQ nZCA== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version :references:in-reply-to:message-id:date:subject:cc:to:from :dkim-signature; bh=YHxhcq+WkRE8J47kVzTCUrhvrbd7xkHvQn8pgrF2wA8=; b=EE+Ag6NwCi4cnSKa+oH9I0iwSU8JZh0K/a7BgXVt2Fs5RFwqpGUSncSGm6YbzL9zqh Id+8zgjzZE4gwsYIvnYr81V0mX0+UpW0g5f0Fvb1TntzCgHGLiV6uXIy3XY2pIjjbabB qAPCf1QBDdrBeKSd8rTiVbx5BoB3RRLPC1AoF9Yo1qG5sDkumf88oVtFPDIvsmIkn6Qs PNEzoo9ktv3qpvJUTN/fOo5MLkIE+HDBnWLkffeFvoqtq/GBf3sjJXkXtU3UyxPLxwBu HALjcZYLrY5rwocOOLfbAupKAT5KTTKF1muEEOrloIvRQoneC8OSM0t1RorJ0OUk5PQ+ e1bg== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@redhat.com header.s=mimecast20190719 header.b=WllbcwcC; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=redhat.com Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [23.128.96.18]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id j8si1753959edt.383.2020.06.30.07.27.10; Tue, 30 Jun 2020 07:27:33 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@redhat.com header.s=mimecast20190719 header.b=WllbcwcC; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=redhat.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S2388861AbgF3O07 (ORCPT + 99 others); Tue, 30 Jun 2020 10:26:59 -0400 Received: from us-smtp-1.mimecast.com ([205.139.110.61]:29428 "EHLO us-smtp-delivery-1.mimecast.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1727874AbgF3O05 (ORCPT ); Tue, 30 Jun 2020 10:26:57 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1593527216; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=YHxhcq+WkRE8J47kVzTCUrhvrbd7xkHvQn8pgrF2wA8=; b=WllbcwcCJF4bvCDGJ/xHP6dfXzNzAJ2yqQJMWm7/6hpZxhQqOEr+EXFlh82ZO4pNt34ruN jluebFFY2QAVVe2h46dfXr/PRIg/uVfwGzfyzybVwHvpZj2Vw+ePYszSjmFy4A3aVuMEiL ZyWJzoLYqIM4D73K98+z702YV5q1tVo= Received: from mimecast-mx01.redhat.com (mimecast-mx01.redhat.com [209.132.183.4]) (Using TLS) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP id us-mta-388-_R2LMmttOyaWeGcJ-WFBjg-1; Tue, 30 Jun 2020 10:26:52 -0400 X-MC-Unique: _R2LMmttOyaWeGcJ-WFBjg-1 Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx08.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.23]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mimecast-mx01.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 454F1DBE2; Tue, 30 Jun 2020 14:26:50 +0000 (UTC) Received: from t480s.redhat.com (ovpn-114-56.ams2.redhat.com [10.36.114.56]) by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B622019C4F; Tue, 30 Jun 2020 14:26:48 +0000 (UTC) From: David Hildenbrand To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Cc: virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, David Hildenbrand , Andrew Morton , Michal Hocko , "Michael S . Tsirkin" Subject: [PATCH v1 1/6] mm/page_alloc: tweak comments in has_unmovable_pages() Date: Tue, 30 Jun 2020 16:26:34 +0200 Message-Id: <20200630142639.22770-2-david@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: <20200630142639.22770-1-david@redhat.com> References: <20200630142639.22770-1-david@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.84 on 10.5.11.23 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Let's move the split comment regarding bootmem allocations and memory holes, especially in the context of ZONE_MOVABLE, to the PageReserved() check. Cc: Andrew Morton Cc: Michal Hocko Cc: Michael S. Tsirkin Signed-off-by: David Hildenbrand --- mm/page_alloc.c | 22 ++++++---------------- 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-) diff --git a/mm/page_alloc.c b/mm/page_alloc.c index 48eb0f1410d47..bd3ebf08f09b9 100644 --- a/mm/page_alloc.c +++ b/mm/page_alloc.c @@ -8207,14 +8207,6 @@ struct page *has_unmovable_pages(struct zone *zone, struct page *page, unsigned long iter = 0; unsigned long pfn = page_to_pfn(page); - /* - * TODO we could make this much more efficient by not checking every - * page in the range if we know all of them are in MOVABLE_ZONE and - * that the movable zone guarantees that pages are migratable but - * the later is not the case right now unfortunatelly. E.g. movablecore - * can still lead to having bootmem allocations in zone_movable. - */ - if (is_migrate_cma_page(page)) { /* * CMA allocations (alloc_contig_range) really need to mark @@ -8233,6 +8225,12 @@ struct page *has_unmovable_pages(struct zone *zone, struct page *page, page = pfn_to_page(pfn + iter); + /* + * Both, bootmem allocations and memory holes are marked + * PG_reserved and are unmovable. We can even have unmovable + * allocations inside ZONE_MOVABLE, for example when + * specifying "movable_core". + */ if (PageReserved(page)) return page; @@ -8306,14 +8304,6 @@ struct page *has_unmovable_pages(struct zone *zone, struct page *page, * it. But now, memory offline itself doesn't call * shrink_node_slabs() and it still to be fixed. */ - /* - * If the page is not RAM, page_count()should be 0. - * we don't need more check. This is an _used_ not-movable page. - * - * The problematic thing here is PG_reserved pages. PG_reserved - * is set to both of a memory hole page and a _used_ kernel - * page at boot. - */ return page; } return NULL; -- 2.26.2