Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932123AbWC3JKu (ORCPT ); Thu, 30 Mar 2006 04:10:50 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S932120AbWC3JKu (ORCPT ); Thu, 30 Mar 2006 04:10:50 -0500 Received: from pproxy.gmail.com ([64.233.166.182]:12177 "EHLO pproxy.gmail.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932123AbWC3JKt convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Thu, 30 Mar 2006 04:10:49 -0500 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=feinGMFvBMehwPSVuhzsyDWsqH0dQdOrsU4exb6Rv9xbYlhcloat9dmu9SL3c8wQoI2T4PtfwYgKckb2R7yUWme7AMPn0Sd6OD+cCvrroSxSe0pe2BMGq8cM+r/WxrmFAQg0mdQgn2On1CH9TLBq2UehsKOfBIbV4TdHzVPTpe8= Message-ID: <58cb370e0603300110p43c33040hdb95a8c871f4b50d@mail.gmail.com> Date: Thu, 30 Mar 2006 11:10:49 +0200 From: "Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz" To: "Alan Cox" Subject: Re: why no option for 'ide=nocddma'? Cc: "Jack Howarth" , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org In-Reply-To: <1143396437.2540.7.camel@localhost.localdomain> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7BIT Content-Disposition: inline References: <20060324184338.7A87511003E@bromo.msbb.uc.edu> <1143396437.2540.7.camel@localhost.localdomain> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1096 Lines: 24 On 3/26/06, Alan Cox wrote: > On Gwe, 2006-03-24 at 13:43 -0500, Jack Howarth wrote: > > release unless users pass the 'ide=nodma' kernel option. If > > the problem with CDs using dma isn't going to be fully resolved, > > why can't we have a 'ide=nocddma' kernel option that would only > > It is nothing to do with DMA. See the postings in 2004 on the subject. > EOF handling in the block layer and IDE layer don't work for the case > where the size of a block device is not precisely defined > > None fo the current block layer maintainers care about fixing it and > nobody else has submitted changes. Feel free to do that. > > Fortunately the drivers/ide layer will hopefully be going away soon EOF handling error has nothing to do with IDE layer, the same problem can be reproduced using libata+PATA patches. Bartlomiej - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/