Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18;
Mime-Version: 1.0
Subject: RE: [PATCH v4 4/5] scsi: ufs: L2P map management for HPB read
Reply-To: daejun7.park@samsung.com
From:   Daejun Park <daejun7.park@samsung.com>
To:     Avri Altman <Avri.Altman@wdc.com>,
        Daejun Park <daejun7.park@samsung.com>,
        "jejb@linux.ibm.com" <jejb@linux.ibm.com>,
        "martin.petersen@oracle.com" <martin.petersen@oracle.com>,
        "asutoshd@codeaurora.org" <asutoshd@codeaurora.org>,
        "beanhuo@micron.com" <beanhuo@micron.com>,
        "stanley.chu@mediatek.com" <stanley.chu@mediatek.com>,
        "cang@codeaurora.org" <cang@codeaurora.org>,
        "bvanassche@acm.org" <bvanassche@acm.org>,
        "tomas.winkler@intel.com" <tomas.winkler@intel.com>,
        ALIM AKHTAR <alim.akhtar@samsung.com>
CC:     "linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org" <linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org>,
        "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        Sang-yoon Oh <sangyoon.oh@samsung.com>,
        Sung-Jun Park <sungjun07.park@samsung.com>,
        yongmyung lee <ymhungry.lee@samsung.com>,
        Jinyoung CHOI <j-young.choi@samsung.com>,
        Adel Choi <adel.choi@samsung.com>,
        BoRam Shin <boram.shin@samsung.com>
In-Reply-To: <SN6PR04MB4640BCE167B108B74D5042E5FC6F0@SN6PR04MB4640.namprd04.prod.outlook.com>
Message-ID: <231786897.01593564481923.JavaMail.epsvc@epcpadp2>
Date:   Wed, 01 Jul 2020 09:11:09 +0900
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
References: <SN6PR04MB4640BCE167B108B74D5042E5FC6F0@SN6PR04MB4640.namprd04.prod.outlook.com>
        <1239183618.61593413882377.JavaMail.epsvc@epcpadp2>
        <963815509.21593413582881.JavaMail.epsvc@epcpadp2>
        <1239183618.61593413402991.JavaMail.epsvc@epcpadp1>
        <231786897.01593413281727.JavaMail.epsvc@epcpadp2>
        <963815509.21593415684555.JavaMail.epsvc@epcpadp2>
        <CGME20200629064323epcms2p787baba58a416fef7fdd3927f8da701da@epcms2p3>
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

> +static int ufshpb_issue_map_req(struct ufshpb_lu *hpb,
> > +                               struct ufshpb_region *rgn,
> > +                               struct ufshpb_subregion *srgn)
> > +{
> 
> 
> > +
> > +       ret = ufshpb_lu_get(hpb);
> > +       if (unlikely(ret)) {
> > +               dev_notice(&hpb->hpb_lu_dev,
> > +                          "%s: ufshpb_lu_get failed: %d", __func__, ret);
> > +               goto free_map_req;
> > +       }
> > +
> > +       ret = ufshpb_execute_map_req(hpb, map_req);
> > +       if (ret) {
> > +               dev_notice(&hpb->hpb_lu_dev,
> > +                          "%s: issue map_req failed: %d, region %d - %d\n",
> > +                          __func__, ret, srgn->rgn_idx, srgn->srgn_idx);
> > +               ufshpb_lu_put(hpb);
> > +               goto free_map_req;
> > +       }
> Missing closing ufshpb_lu_put?

ufshpb_lu_put() is called at ufshpb_map_req_compl_fn() which is completed
callback function. Callilng ufshpb_lu_put() in ufshpb_issue_map_req() is
used for error handling.

Thanks,
Daejun