Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18;
Date:   Wed, 1 Jul 2020 08:55:10 +0200
From:   Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To:     Pavel Machek <pavel@denx.de>
Cc:     Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>,
        Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, torvalds@linux-foundation.org,
        akpm@linux-foundation.org, shuah@kernel.org, patches@kernelci.org,
        ben.hutchings@codethink.co.uk, lkft-triage@lists.linaro.org,
        stable@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4.9 00/59] 4.9.226-rc2 review
Message-ID: <20200701065510.GD2044019@kroah.com>
References: <20200602101841.662517961@linuxfoundation.org>
 <3c900c0e-b15c-da05-d3d8-e68acf660076@roeck-us.net>
 <20200602163346.GQ1407771@sasha-vm>
 <20200630214634.GC7113@duo.ucw.cz>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20200630214634.GC7113@duo.ucw.cz>
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

On Tue, Jun 30, 2020 at 11:46:34PM +0200, Pavel Machek wrote:
> Hi!
> 
> > >FWIW, if we need/want to use unified assembler in v4.9.y, shouldn't all unified
> > >assembler patches be applied ?
> > 
> > We don't - I took 71f8af111010 as a dependency rather than on its own
> > merit.
> 
> Would it be possible to somehow mark patches that are "dependency"
> rather than "on their own"? It would make review easier...

That's a lot of extra work on our part, and would make the changelog
text change, which isn't always liked, sorry.

greg k-h