Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932209AbWC3Ni5 (ORCPT ); Thu, 30 Mar 2006 08:38:57 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S932210AbWC3Ni5 (ORCPT ); Thu, 30 Mar 2006 08:38:57 -0500 Received: from ebiederm.dsl.xmission.com ([166.70.28.69]:31412 "EHLO ebiederm.dsl.xmission.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932209AbWC3Ni4 (ORCPT ); Thu, 30 Mar 2006 08:38:56 -0500 To: "Serge E. Hallyn" Cc: Chris Wright , Sam Vilain , Nick Piggin , Herbert Poetzl , Bill Davidsen , Linux Kernel ML Subject: Re: [RFC] Virtualization steps References: <4428FB29.8020402@yahoo.com.au> <20060328142639.GE14576@MAIL.13thfloor.at> <44294BE4.2030409@yahoo.com.au> <442A26E9.20608@vilain.net> <20060329182027.GB14724@sorel.sous-sol.org> <442B0BFE.9080709@vilain.net> <20060329225241.GO15997@sorel.sous-sol.org> <20060330013618.GS15997@sorel.sous-sol.org> <20060330132922.GB6933@sergelap.austin.ibm.com> From: ebiederm@xmission.com (Eric W. Biederman) Date: Thu, 30 Mar 2006 06:37:10 -0700 In-Reply-To: <20060330132922.GB6933@sergelap.austin.ibm.com> (Serge E. Hallyn's message of "Thu, 30 Mar 2006 07:29:22 -0600") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.1007 (Gnus v5.10.7) Emacs/21.4 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1288 Lines: 30 "Serge E. Hallyn" writes: > Quoting Chris Wright (chrisw@sous-sol.org): >> * Eric W. Biederman (ebiederm@xmission.com) wrote: >> > At least one implementation Linux Jails by Serge E. Hallyn was done > completely >> > with security modules, and the code was pretty minimal. >> >> Yes, although the networking area was something that looked better done >> via namespaces (at least that's my recollection of my conversations with >> Serge on that one a few years back). > > Yes, namespaces would be better - just as the file system isolation was > moved from a "strong chroot" approach to using pivot-root. Though note > that vserver still uses basically the method that bsdjail uses, and my > two attempts at getting network namespaces considered in the kernel so > far were dismal failures. Hopefully this time we've got some better, > more network-savvy minds on the task :) Any pointers to those old discussions? I'm curious why getting your network namespaces were dismal failures. Everyone ignored the patch? Eric - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/