Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18;
Date:   Wed, 1 Jul 2020 13:53:24 +0000
From:   Luis Chamberlain <mcgrof@kernel.org>
To:     Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@i-love.sakura.ne.jp>
Cc:     Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com>,
        Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>, ast@kernel.org,
        axboe@kernel.dk, bfields@fieldses.org,
        bridge@lists.linux-foundation.org, chainsaw@gentoo.org,
        christian.brauner@ubuntu.com, chuck.lever@oracle.com,
        davem@davemloft.net, dhowells@redhat.com,
        gregkh@linuxfoundation.org, jarkko.sakkinen@linux.intel.com,
        jmorris@namei.org, josh@joshtriplett.org, keescook@chromium.org,
        keyrings@vger.kernel.org, kuba@kernel.org,
        lars.ellenberg@linbit.com, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org,
        linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org, nikolay@cumulusnetworks.com,
        philipp.reisner@linbit.com, ravenexp@gmail.com,
        roopa@cumulusnetworks.com, serge@hallyn.com, slyfox@gentoo.org,
        viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk, yangtiezhu@loongson.cn,
        netdev@vger.kernel.org, markward@linux.ibm.com,
        linux-s390 <linux-s390@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: linux-next: umh: fix processed error when UMH_WAIT_PROC is used
 seems to break linux bridge on s390x (bisected)
Message-ID: <20200701135324.GS4332@42.do-not-panic.com>
References: <9e767819-9bbe-2181-521e-4d8ca28ca4f7@de.ibm.com>
 <20200624160953.GH4332@42.do-not-panic.com>
 <ea41e2a9-61f7-aec1-79e5-7b08b6dd5119@de.ibm.com>
 <4e27098e-ac8d-98f0-3a9a-ea25242e24ec@de.ibm.com>
 <4d8fbcea-a892-3453-091f-d57c03f9aa90@de.ibm.com>
 <1263e370-7cee-24d8-b98c-117bf7c90a83@de.ibm.com>
 <20200626025410.GJ4332@42.do-not-panic.com>
 <20200630175704.GO13911@42.do-not-panic.com>
 <b24d8dae-1872-ba2c-acd4-ed46c0781317@de.ibm.com>
 <a6792135-3285-0861-014e-3db85ea251dc@i-love.sakura.ne.jp>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <a6792135-3285-0861-014e-3db85ea251dc@i-love.sakura.ne.jp>
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

On Wed, Jul 01, 2020 at 10:24:29PM +0900, Tetsuo Handa wrote:
> On 2020/07/01 19:08, Christian Borntraeger wrote:
> > 
> > 
> > On 30.06.20 19:57, Luis Chamberlain wrote:
> >> On Fri, Jun 26, 2020 at 02:54:10AM +0000, Luis Chamberlain wrote:
> >>> On Wed, Jun 24, 2020 at 08:37:55PM +0200, Christian Borntraeger wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> On 24.06.20 20:32, Christian Borntraeger wrote:
> >>>> [...]> 
> >>>>> So the translations look correct. But your change is actually a sematic change
> >>>>> if(ret) will only trigger if there is an error
> >>>>> if (KWIFEXITED(ret)) will always trigger when the process ends. So we will always overwrite -ECHILD
> >>>>> and we did not do it before. 
> >>>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> So the right fix is
> >>>>
> >>>> diff --git a/kernel/umh.c b/kernel/umh.c
> >>>> index f81e8698e36e..a3a3196e84d1 100644
> >>>> --- a/kernel/umh.c
> >>>> +++ b/kernel/umh.c
> >>>> @@ -154,7 +154,7 @@ static void call_usermodehelper_exec_sync(struct subprocess_info *sub_info)
> >>>>                  * the real error code is already in sub_info->retval or
> >>>>                  * sub_info->retval is 0 anyway, so don't mess with it then.
> >>>>                  */
> >>>> -               if (KWIFEXITED(ret))
> >>>> +               if (KWEXITSTATUS(ret))
> >>>>                         sub_info->retval = KWEXITSTATUS(ret);
> 
> Well, it is not br_stp_call_user() but br_stp_start() which is expecting
> to set sub_info->retval for both KWIFEXITED() case and KWIFSIGNALED() case.
> That is, sub_info->retval needs to carry raw value (i.e. without "umh: fix
> processed error when UMH_WAIT_PROC is used" will be the correct behavior).

br_stp_start() doesn't check for the raw value, it just checks for err
or !err. So the patch, "umh: fix processed error when UMH_WAIT_PROC is
used" propagates the correct error now.

Christian, can you try removing the binary temporarily and seeing if
you get your bridge working?

  Luis