Received: by 2002:a05:6902:102b:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id x11csp873300ybt; Wed, 1 Jul 2020 12:08:23 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJxbipcHWCVaNXRhcm1uqAxNniFPZ5CBmi5BnQYjDn93x85VKKPlPyRO43nGRs/PD40YUUuj X-Received: by 2002:a17:906:2c53:: with SMTP id f19mr22222394ejh.523.1593630503084; Wed, 01 Jul 2020 12:08:23 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1593630503; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=JldKwZPRXg/6FdltoHPdTGk032M2p+XmZgZ9J6ALGBRIIWVypDTEERRAsux1xhg45B bAyMKGZH3w08CpU6LMTCikFMz5iLOlRws9lUUXjNVuH3S0SUDOvkXYuywBYxNNnj/M3P FT5cRR3AUdqPpZiECygnqjJKONLAbOxSC4Hl5kndo7Qa0HqDWmMVGlmUDNaFA1Rlwrv/ Svs/oND5PWDMwgrROeH+uFXkCEMmHDLQ6/RU4BjrK1jPrebijRFaPTbBdzAZmXMe/lXi wxCXIzzbSr8R+VLqiomFVFNqozk3ZooZ16Nqks0j1fEGmiDH3AQxMuXqxazEOKdcCiC3 oxig== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version :message-id:date:subject:cc:to:from; bh=kp5OgFPf2/cSAF4CUwAE3iavBtznn/psZvmn6WsFOAY=; b=YX0ZFb4tF+UxhqfQibiErupuYo0CHb8DDAXTZfwSKJJRbUV2IBXpt8a1JRxI8f7jnM zCKOOPEzw5NNYMxaJBkbPcpG+E3FNWEmUbtAye2np4N1jMW+JrBTfwLr5kEcMSwOS5uL +EidJAEfe2avmxsTcTq44z5IKOjT5/Hl2CcSkhXXNRQ0fvag6DGmvbqhh6k2B/TG+e+5 cHvUbaxeBzw97GT4uhZX6PIRG15lg56gd88mmAeGPWn4PDKpR55jWPFKkWPIRzuB2ecu NApGGURKOxicye1Tm+/d9hzvOUWupPnj7baDbWMRIrclNAsn2bO9iZBHtirXV9NRdgxL Nwug== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [23.128.96.18]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id l15si4348986ejq.119.2020.07.01.12.07.34; Wed, 01 Jul 2020 12:08:23 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726129AbgGATHV (ORCPT + 99 others); Wed, 1 Jul 2020 15:07:21 -0400 Received: from foss.arm.com ([217.140.110.172]:39768 "EHLO foss.arm.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1725875AbgGATHV (ORCPT ); Wed, 1 Jul 2020 15:07:21 -0400 Received: from usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (unknown [10.121.207.14]) by usa-sjc-mx-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 48DFE1FB; Wed, 1 Jul 2020 12:07:20 -0700 (PDT) Received: from e113632-lin.cambridge.arm.com (e113632-lin.cambridge.arm.com [10.1.194.46]) by usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 48AAF3F68F; Wed, 1 Jul 2020 12:07:19 -0700 (PDT) From: Valentin Schneider To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Cc: mingo@kernel.org, peterz@infradead.org, vincent.guittot@linaro.org, dietmar.eggemann@arm.com, morten.rasmussen@arm.com Subject: [PATCH v3 0/7] sched: Instrument sched domain flags Date: Wed, 1 Jul 2020 20:06:48 +0100 Message-Id: <20200701190656.10126-1-valentin.schneider@arm.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.27.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi, I've repeatedly stared at an SD flag and asked myself "how should that be set up in the domain hierarchy anyway?". I figured that if we formalize our flags zoology a bit, we could also do some runtime assertions on them - this is what this series is all about. Patches ======= The idea is to associate the flags with metaflags that describes how they should be set in a sched domain hierarchy ("if this SD has it, all its {parents, children} have it") or how they behave wrt degeneration - details are in the comments and commit logs. The good thing is that the debugging bits go away when CONFIG_SCHED_DEBUG isn't set. The bad thing is that this replaces SD_* flags definitions with some unsavoury macros. This is mainly because I wanted to avoid having to duplicate work between declaring the flags and declaring their metaflags. o Patches 1-2 set up the SD flag definition groundwork o Patch 3 enables the hierarchy debugging o Patch 4 is a derelict SD flag removal o Patches 5-7 tweak the SD degeneration to leverage metaflags as well (suggested by Peter). Note that this builds a compile-time mask using the single most horrendous macro I have ever presented to the public eye. It might end up being much better to explicitely build the mask in topology.h, but to be honest I felt like I had to show that monster around out of morbid fascination. Revisions ========= v2 -> v3 -------- o Reworded comment for SD_OVERLAP (it's about the groups, not the domains) o Added more flags to the SD degeneration mask o Added generation of an SD flag mask for the degeneration functions (Peter) RFC -> v2 --------- o Rebased on top of tip/sched/core o Aligned wording of comments between flags o Rectified some flag descriptions (Morten) o Added removal of SD_SHARE_POWERDOMAIN (Morten) Valentin Schneider (7): sched/topology: Split out SD_* flags declaration to its own file sched/topology: Define and assign sched_domain flag metadata sched/topology: Verify SD_* flags setup when sched_debug is on arm, sched/topology: Remove SD_SHARE_POWERDOMAIN sched/topology: Add more flags to the SD degeneration mask sched/topology: Introduce SD metaflag for flags needing > 1 groups sched/topology: Use prebuilt SD flag degeneration mask arch/arm/kernel/topology.c | 2 +- include/linux/sched/sd_flags.h | 153 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ include/linux/sched/topology.h | 36 +++++--- kernel/sched/topology.c | 40 +++++---- 4 files changed, 197 insertions(+), 34 deletions(-) create mode 100644 include/linux/sched/sd_flags.h -- 2.27.0