Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1750717AbWC3Sw0 (ORCPT ); Thu, 30 Mar 2006 13:52:26 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1750731AbWC3Sw0 (ORCPT ); Thu, 30 Mar 2006 13:52:26 -0500 Received: from 216-99-217-87.dsl.aracnet.com ([216.99.217.87]:5248 "EHLO sorel.sous-sol.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750717AbWC3SwZ (ORCPT ); Thu, 30 Mar 2006 13:52:25 -0500 Date: Thu, 30 Mar 2006 10:53:34 -0800 From: Chris Wright To: "Serge E. Hallyn" Cc: Chris Wright , David Lang , "Eric W. Biederman" , Sam Vilain , Nick Piggin , Herbert Poetzl , Bill Davidsen , Linux Kernel ML Subject: Re: [RFC] Virtualization steps Message-ID: <20060330185334.GW15997@sorel.sous-sol.org> References: <442A26E9.20608@vilain.net> <20060329182027.GB14724@sorel.sous-sol.org> <442B0BFE.9080709@vilain.net> <20060329225241.GO15997@sorel.sous-sol.org> <20060330013618.GS15997@sorel.sous-sol.org> <20060330020445.GT15997@sorel.sous-sol.org> <20060330143224.GC6933@sergelap.austin.ibm.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20060330143224.GC6933@sergelap.austin.ibm.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1122 Lines: 26 * Serge E. Hallyn (serue@us.ibm.com) wrote: > Quoting Chris Wright (chrisw@sous-sol.org): > > This is all fine. The question is whether this is a policy management > > issue or a kernel infrastructure issue. So far, it's not clear that this > > really necessitates kernel infrastructure changes to support container > > aware policies to be loaded by physical host admin/owner or the virtual > > host admin. The place where it breaks down is if each virtual host > > wants not only to control its own policy, but also its security model. > > What do you define as 'policy', and how is it different from the > security model? Model, as in TE, RBAC, or something trivially simple ala Openwall type protection. Policy, as in rules to drive the model. > Second, we might want container admins to insert LSMs. I think we can agree that this way lies madness. thanks, -chris - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/