Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18;
From:   "Namjae Jeon" <namjae.jeon@samsung.com>
To:     "'Sasha Levin'" <sashal@kernel.org>
Cc:     <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>, <stable@vger.kernel.org>,
        <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
In-Reply-To: <20200702013824.GH2687961@sasha-vm>
Subject: RE: [PATCH 5.7.y 0/5] exfat stable patches for 5.7.y
Date:   Thu, 2 Jul 2020 10:45:16 +0900
Message-ID: <002101d65012$6f861560$4e924020$@samsung.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Thread-Index: AQHpU7TLZu4sPgwmGsLVIX6Hklol4AD9uaezAhVcfvmotON5IA==
Content-Language: ko
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
CMS-TYPE: 101P
DLP-Filter: Pass
References: <CGME20200701232535epcas1p3787fa9426c087372556cba2fdb7232ac@epcas1p3.samsung.com>
        <20200701232024.2083-1-namjae.jeon@samsung.com>
        <20200702013824.GH2687961@sasha-vm>
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

> Hi Namjae,
Hi Sasha,
> 
> On Thu, Jul 02, 2020 at 08:20:19AM +0900, Namjae Jeon wrote:
> >Could you please push exfat stable patches into 5.7.y kernel tree ?
> 
> I've queued them up, however it would be much easier if for commits that don't require any
> modification to allow backporting you would just provide the commit ids in Linus's tree rather than
> the patches themselves.
> 
> I do see that you had to modify this one:
> 
> >Sungjong Seo (1):
> >  exfat: flush dirty metadata in fsync
> 
> In which case, a header in the commit message indicating the upstream commit id would be appriciated.
> Something like this:
Okay, I'll do that next time!
Thank you!
> 
> [ Upstream commit 5267456e953fd8c5abd8e278b1cc6a9f9027ac0a ]
> 
> Thank you!
> 
> --
> Thanks,
> Sasha