Received: by 2002:a05:6902:102b:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id x11csp1220101ybt; Wed, 1 Jul 2020 23:15:12 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJyoELmw52oLlVFiW/j7Ugm4rvrr1vzlG5G42QyYbYBfRaLH2KvNCGvp/chDx3i0jLeq5dhY X-Received: by 2002:a05:6402:363:: with SMTP id s3mr21436692edw.238.1593670512511; Wed, 01 Jul 2020 23:15:12 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1593670512; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=wG/E2SrmXuzgF828dDWpsE5vVuP4qhsre2x+VKQXBam4jg+zBOjDOG1dMuX0UlF8Im 6NEwqitFCxDh4J3MwH57PGCOzQ7VEkDx6vq+xoZcLKCvmgzbm/EvbWIMF0/KGan5oq20 Or+ENFhsqEHKHE1Qce7Np0WGeFEzpQLkoHy4tt5m5gr4GWHcbeSNBPmxhNFDbYfpHL5P XoIPztaJa8H9+qpvecoJBKvdlSU5Zd5/IKHx8VmydgAK0D1aGc9L8KycE8vycYKzrVEF Kf6VAbNh/HE+RKErVs4u2b7LyX+0Ll5NyIWGwy1nLiVCnlPPqsCiqamPSbEoPGnGBlC6 62Mg== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:content-transfer-encoding :content-language:in-reply-to:mime-version:user-agent:date :message-id:from:references:cc:to:subject:dkim-signature; bh=F/rMuyuvEyEfi/6FryOT8XNai0M0Cykvyrz5tU+jLoo=; b=Dd4KJIhE9Ap0O5CDTREy/lrmZ8m35p1UOb/W4gei0knwCBth/ohF/seFzPk5LGXfAL hbJ0J+Cf5HdoXs8PS1VqVBaR5J9cbUZK2H1GlTXgceeCXYhh/VT1KbqUI7UQd2mqFa0H mcR+Tw0Y5BZ9WYJm9NbvVYjT5GWH8xo9eK0DUnPw5u9wG7fkmzJBzMaYfPbKglKSzVD9 tBnxbWklvcBeaHFqpUMbj5Xws7VyQ9LI4rwPiN+Ny2HOujcPj3Vq/4EsDgRSkZXzGL9r PxD62YNFhjVmx4IO3LxZy4jR7mjomwiUmUoqh+mcfBECTqMfUEj0wmGczy5d94BpOdbv BGcg== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@netrounds-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com header.s=20150623 header.b=Cis4kNAo; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [23.128.96.18]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id e8si5417876edy.494.2020.07.01.23.14.49; Wed, 01 Jul 2020 23:15:12 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@netrounds-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com header.s=20150623 header.b=Cis4kNAo; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726367AbgGBGOj (ORCPT + 99 others); Thu, 2 Jul 2020 02:14:39 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:55474 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1725774AbgGBGOj (ORCPT ); Thu, 2 Jul 2020 02:14:39 -0400 Received: from mail-lf1-x12e.google.com (mail-lf1-x12e.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::12e]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id F22BAC08C5C1 for ; Wed, 1 Jul 2020 23:14:38 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-lf1-x12e.google.com with SMTP id u25so15271624lfm.1 for ; Wed, 01 Jul 2020 23:14:38 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=netrounds-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id:date:user-agent :mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language:content-transfer-encoding; bh=F/rMuyuvEyEfi/6FryOT8XNai0M0Cykvyrz5tU+jLoo=; b=Cis4kNAoB7Bzb9zXm4S1rMZfQDTsxKJCUW7enqkypgJkJiiaentFQ9x+VfJAUjA9F5 pBpF6yLg7sKhk/mKJIPZdVnI+BAaykmLkjd7XirSvZsn5XnZYCCkOfBIgwWh8SMt7cJS TJ43WS5jMb7zmZH6OGsaZjHjgFqiYgN8DBZh8vM127eJ/kING+BWHao3CXyCN1AEGXHa JYLvJKHwkb4vVdIlq0HuwDG6pBgxuz5TwMP3vd3Y6xZAzCrraW0UCAt0W8DERReC3WJ9 XQkB08hl789zTjELaaTwAiklcpOmeOU7cjV2tfdy2/oIIVi085TmagrF6I0jHtRjMzBA LwrQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id:date :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language :content-transfer-encoding; bh=F/rMuyuvEyEfi/6FryOT8XNai0M0Cykvyrz5tU+jLoo=; b=Thdn5qBttujB8b/olC7pfCmqcHXtOnFUaqMaVxXxdquPR4CyqozZKRPCCBms+4akdm n2fEPx8002H+MxOkQRQJN719QPMYLLtsdA7ZAYXQJVRP+JYuBd9Ua+NaR13uMDer74/n ajgjeyzunoP1CzC/vcZCXXUJFRvUZReD7o9qiYAOWtGXhuqt43tfprGRKNqcFmluXxj+ vX6SHFdMwJaJwr6f5NDEMCwy6HD8C0tcedyfyGxFVkkIhe1fccaEwqm2uKz9C7Nb/S5V 9JCSeWh3VEEu22IgVQVtjjQ7BLXDnJMrGwRVODSwPt/GpMeSedF9PVlwYMbpAckv24lN vltg== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM532pA8m4NpPX6xIxZH/zpfz6RQNRUoOXMdo8GmZigbRU0VmYRbSW Zl9oo4MnyWm0kcJyiRIy4A+qug== X-Received: by 2002:ac2:5a50:: with SMTP id r16mr17945836lfn.170.1593670477459; Wed, 01 Jul 2020 23:14:37 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.1.169] (h-137-65.A159.priv.bahnhof.se. [81.170.137.65]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id m2sm2574458ljc.58.2020.07.01.23.14.35 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Wed, 01 Jul 2020 23:14:37 -0700 (PDT) Subject: Re: Packet gets stuck in NOLOCK pfifo_fast qdisc To: Cong Wang , Josh Hunt Cc: Paolo Abeni , Michael Zhivich , David Miller , John Fastabend , LKML , Linux Kernel Network Developers References: <465a540e-5296-32e7-f6a6-79942dfe2618@netrounds.com> <20200623134259.8197-1-mzhivich@akamai.com> <1849b74f-163c-8cfa-baa5-f653159fefd4@akamai.com> From: Jonas Bonn Message-ID: <7fd86d97-6785-0b5f-1e95-92bc1da9df35@netrounds.com> Date: Thu, 2 Jul 2020 08:14:34 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.8.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi Cong, On 01/07/2020 21:58, Cong Wang wrote: > On Wed, Jul 1, 2020 at 9:05 AM Cong Wang wrote: >> >> On Tue, Jun 30, 2020 at 2:08 PM Josh Hunt wrote: >>> Do either of you know if there's been any development on a fix for this >>> issue? If not we can propose something. >> >> If you have a reproducer, I can look into this. > > Does the attached patch fix this bug completely? It's easier to comment if you inline the patch, but after taking a quick look it seems too simplistic. i) Are you sure you haven't got the return values on qdisc_run reversed? ii) There's a "bypass" path that skips the enqueue/dequeue operation if the queue is empty; that needs a similar treatment: after releasing seqlock it needs to ensure that another packet hasn't been enqueued since it last checked. /Jonas > > Thanks. >