Received: by 2002:a05:6902:102b:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id x11csp1318422ybt; Thu, 2 Jul 2020 02:24:45 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwCWhibItvXmDsza2IlPu/y8Kri0DIPwgcDYRLAqK4DVN+Q5/Tlj3dSAuK2kLwA1l0FKqre X-Received: by 2002:a05:6402:13d0:: with SMTP id a16mr33585467edx.269.1593681885739; Thu, 02 Jul 2020 02:24:45 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1593681885; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=dKUyEGYfe32lY5u2lRIzfRmVamEU3gaPo4LDmvdSDi2TmSrAotGC2cvN2j3q2Oe6Mz llAD3ev3qdzq2AxXc7insKBNsyM8obGTmJbDuzVnC7QafRohIII5h4AiPJLwE3xHXfmb lbD8d2eCWMi+e9Xw7W/3xnh/cJeIBhXhS1XeZ3RksxZjVDdBtZDWiWgXY9rUN+ZGoP1B JggGWfQjbulzTLNLG8pETQIvrEA/kDNocxnfi3fzhjN20yqxOSFHCm3U8nejXReYQK+I bkMyyMIrDPUdf6O1i7KETGuNmOTvYLAWO1agxa04L6GMCJA5OUwJ8QdHB6Z8A67wz8We ba0A== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from :in-reply-to:references:mime-version; bh=wCkBw3oirGVCWmjI/nTGUzVc7Xs3iHGv9e1O9Q6s09o=; b=AgviG/zJdxFY+8Km5o5elwEXJ+CUu/cdDE4wHsmt0We55rR/IXsZ4KnQpDXeEzNL2c njIx6bd3bmWHALJvOBB06Gl7EmnZrBB6iqhRjAAdAoo1+PFqr4PcQL3+36jBzPgHwOV5 6shbsOVCqPyzeZaK3a/zp8UV8cnTzxeVo/NnEQOvFGUWN6Ce5X3nzE6QiLGqhRfTMBo9 lt6ZLrl/DzZK0DwgpjBx7pFsMD+zZ90kToyHr0S1/4KzS8/xe48yivK3IMmiGTta2XLv AeZgAmJWHQP2l8rZtkX96RBXuXpgjrl4gDUV/6WdEl1xESel8tG4fSTDsyGM5AhT38A2 ViuA== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [23.128.96.18]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id k7si6239086edk.69.2020.07.02.02.24.23; Thu, 02 Jul 2020 02:24:45 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1727791AbgGBJX4 (ORCPT + 99 others); Thu, 2 Jul 2020 05:23:56 -0400 Received: from mail-oi1-f193.google.com ([209.85.167.193]:35220 "EHLO mail-oi1-f193.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726183AbgGBJXz (ORCPT ); Thu, 2 Jul 2020 05:23:55 -0400 Received: by mail-oi1-f193.google.com with SMTP id k4so23132504oik.2; Thu, 02 Jul 2020 02:23:55 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=wCkBw3oirGVCWmjI/nTGUzVc7Xs3iHGv9e1O9Q6s09o=; b=MP7oqvcD8TQKBP99o4o1QkIoLNPrN49j441P1gCP1a+YnoSaIzlYruP2movZULeGWr 3ogHW4Ra0SeG1gO0t4dZyw4joj5QcHpraNrq+fKX7mABOanN7L2h9Ydfu1x27U54QDvz ZUlWDMZCH+K6rshgO85WhBpvINF1baojpWctqQ3gGAeOeHJ9EQB8HVanFtSTa5qt1DL1 y6Qfl1/Ka3Gm4RSSLFAkpQwuX1D+7vpySQsJi2E5VqcOI/a1ns6Cy4WWhArpGluoHpUh fUqYEdY/klyqnCjovYUUuZutSGRVb7cX2CoG9UZ79TBL8KpZl/gmFRfw5PvT5VeSF2ur Kmqg== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM533ozLJ6g2euFbMUVvjIdUalmrF8XREbjZfFk0MH/RNIk8sNBkLE OCn4ZD9qs2xQxpzMTrJ4UospF7l88d2jWdAbIoE= X-Received: by 2002:aca:1801:: with SMTP id h1mr18281530oih.148.1593681834441; Thu, 02 Jul 2020 02:23:54 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <1593618100-2151-1-git-send-email-prabhakar.mahadev-lad.rj@bp.renesas.com> In-Reply-To: From: Geert Uytterhoeven Date: Thu, 2 Jul 2020 11:23:42 +0200 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH] serial: sh-sci: Initialize spinlock for uart console To: "Lad, Prabhakar" Cc: Lad Prabhakar , Greg Kroah-Hartman , Jiri Slaby , Linux-Renesas , "open list:SERIAL DRIVERS" , Linux Kernel Mailing List , Biju Das Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi Prabhakar, On Wed, Jul 1, 2020 at 7:28 PM Lad, Prabhakar wrote: > On Wed, Jul 1, 2020 at 6:17 PM Geert Uytterhoeven wrote: > > On Wed, Jul 1, 2020 at 5:42 PM Lad Prabhakar > > wrote: > > > serial core expects the spinlock to be initialized by the controller > > > driver for serial console, this patch makes sure the spinlock is > > > initialized, fixing the below issue: > > > > > > [ 0.865928] BUG: spinlock bad magic on CPU#0, swapper/0/1 > > > [ 0.865945] lock: sci_ports+0x0/0x4c80, .magic: 00000000, .owner: /-1, .owner_cpu: 0 > > > [ 0.865955] CPU: 0 PID: 1 Comm: swapper/0 Not tainted 5.8.0-rc1+ #112 > > > [ 0.865961] Hardware name: HopeRun HiHope RZ/G2H with sub board (DT) > > > [ 0.865968] Call trace: > > > [ 0.865979] dump_backtrace+0x0/0x1d8 > > > [ 0.865985] show_stack+0x14/0x20 > > > [ 0.865996] dump_stack+0xe8/0x130 > > > [ 0.866006] spin_dump+0x6c/0x88 > > > [ 0.866012] do_raw_spin_lock+0xb0/0xf8 > > > [ 0.866023] _raw_spin_lock_irqsave+0x80/0xa0 > > > [ 0.866032] uart_add_one_port+0x3a4/0x4e0 > > > [ 0.866039] sci_probe+0x504/0x7c8 > > > [ 0.866048] platform_drv_probe+0x50/0xa0 > > > [ 0.866059] really_probe+0xdc/0x330 > > > [ 0.866066] driver_probe_device+0x58/0xb8 > > > [ 0.866072] device_driver_attach+0x6c/0x90 > > > [ 0.866078] __driver_attach+0x88/0xd0 > > > [ 0.866085] bus_for_each_dev+0x74/0xc8 > > > [ 0.866091] driver_attach+0x20/0x28 > > > [ 0.866098] bus_add_driver+0x14c/0x1f8 > > > [ 0.866104] driver_register+0x60/0x110 > > > [ 0.866109] __platform_driver_register+0x40/0x48 > > > [ 0.866119] sci_init+0x2c/0x34 > > > [ 0.866127] do_one_initcall+0x88/0x428 > > > [ 0.866137] kernel_init_freeable+0x2c0/0x328 > > > [ 0.866143] kernel_init+0x10/0x108 > > > [ 0.866150] ret_from_fork+0x10/0x18 > > > > Interesting... > > > > How can I reproduce that? I do have CONFIG_DEBUG_SPINLOCK=y. > > I'm wondering why haven't we seen this before... > > > I have attached .config for your reference. Thank you! I gave it a try with v5.8-rc1 on Salvator-XS with R-Car H3 ES2.0. However, I couldn't reproduce the issue. Does it happen on that specific board only? Is this serdev-related? Note that I had to disable CONFIG_EXTRA_FIRMWARE, as I don't have the firmware blobs it referenced. Do I need them to trigger the issue? As the .config has a few non-upstream options, do you have any patches applied that might impact the issue? Thanks again! Gr{oetje,eeting}s, Geert -- Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@linux-m68k.org In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that. -- Linus Torvalds