Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Thu, 25 Oct 2001 16:48:16 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Thu, 25 Oct 2001 16:48:06 -0400 Received: from lightning.swansea.linux.org.uk ([194.168.151.1]:22532 "EHLO the-village.bc.nu") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Thu, 25 Oct 2001 16:48:00 -0400 Subject: Re: 2.4.12-ac4 10Mbit NE2k interrupt load kills p166 To: gandalf@wlug.westbo.se (Martin Josefsson) Date: Thu, 25 Oct 2001 21:54:46 +0100 (BST) Cc: alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk (Alan Cox), bcrl@redhat.com (Benjamin LaHaise), _deepfire@mail.ru (Samium Gromoff), linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org In-Reply-To: from "Martin Josefsson" at Oct 25, 2001 10:40:49 PM X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.5 PL6] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: From: Alan Cox Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org > Then I upgraded that machine to pIII 700 and even that machine slows to a > crawl while transmitting with that bloody ISA NE2K. It's the same thing in > kernel 2.4 too. These days I simply don't use that card anymore... > > So something seems to have taken a wrong turn between 2.0 and 2.2 > I don't think this is a problem intruduced in 2.4. A faster machine will take as long as a slow machine with an ne2000. It doesn't matter if its an 8Mb 386 or a dual athlon, it will spend almost all of its ne2000 handling time poking bytes across an 8MHz bus. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/