Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751138AbWC3XSG (ORCPT ); Thu, 30 Mar 2006 18:18:06 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751135AbWC3XSG (ORCPT ); Thu, 30 Mar 2006 18:18:06 -0500 Received: from fmr19.intel.com ([134.134.136.18]:7892 "EHLO orsfmr004.jf.intel.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751132AbWC3XSF (ORCPT ); Thu, 30 Mar 2006 18:18:05 -0500 Message-ID: <442C672A.2030707@ichips.intel.com> Date: Thu, 30 Mar 2006 15:18:02 -0800 From: Sean Hefty User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.6 (Windows/20050716) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Roland Dreier CC: openib-general@openib.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [openib-general] updated InfiniBand 2.6.17 merge plans References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 952 Lines: 25 Roland Dreier wrote: > * RDMA CM. In my git tree at > > git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/roland/infiniband.git rdma_cm > > None of the users of this code look are to merge, and it looks like > there's some changes in the design happening now. Seems like this > can and should wait for 2.6.18. Does it make sense to merge the first two patches of that patch series? 1. Provide common handling for marshalling data between userspace clients and kernel mode Infiniband drivers. 2. Extend the Infiniband CM to include private data comparisons as part of its connection request matching process. This would make it easier to keep the openib tree in sync with the kernel. - Sean - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/