Received: by 2002:a05:6902:102b:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id x11csp1601060ybt; Thu, 2 Jul 2020 09:12:09 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJxnOzpXcG+KBNeD4PMfZ5rZys1Kkz+BIr64Zz4ZSU1S2Yj2etn6ruRHQZQVUncQo7UwEszL X-Received: by 2002:aa7:c80f:: with SMTP id a15mr34676602edt.299.1593706329711; Thu, 02 Jul 2020 09:12:09 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1593706329; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=IH6OS7v8OSu1aezDTV7IdNYYYKF+aqbz+x6bwm/RAaf/kDvJp3TZOTaMIT3+f+mZBs FmrUCYjRhtyvgORPaxyRsLQ6sRr1sc2TGeVxwFIx9yA1Ka52bWk3Y4LpG5fj5JWK3NMS 7tOQRKs0IVIXZyR8NbHqPaxusPP8cxtQVhAEEWY063qBbzHl5nRF9BQSGJwvbekWlzbm d63BFj8UNxiWfC8kZatK8/loXcGxi4Dq9bhshY2Km3htAB9oklZ9FgGgoLX7ipvQ+2AC ugaDvhbCDEooHp1zIbX9qcMieyVk70kP0tz4eckHuq0mopBe2cLb89yFQ7eM+R3n7AQW 76cw== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:mime-version:message-id:date:in-reply-to :subject:cc:to:from:user-agent:references; bh=jAh+OiJBWTrZUESAC0r9sA/GVzdCH9Ja20WmGsDv0iI=; b=PVOK5reBNki3UEN43HdGykfFKlYXN36dg5eROfcTkWZgw+5ruReA/DjJNdB0xmeWB9 WC7PPNs6jR9+0Bw3WCcmVst+DO9ODtqW0QYGaiOYkEHBPPQXsJvsl8jusU1or3SvGxYF TkjkucSeh+OTzIGjxOe8WdW8hd2Br66lfEgXRHi8PXoNGlbx/gJSrafHpokEMjbnV1gl WlU18H2rGQY7wijecinqac0LSEc2Vzrv2GoOie+6xCrIh2T2Be5sceZ5ImR/zK8CeixV es/sEM8Wdhy730SQJbTzuUwqGnM1e/q1DqEbwc57nWtn6n57tceaE4rwfAiios2EaO9b Us3g== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [23.128.96.18]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id dn1si7805154ejc.638.2020.07.02.09.11.46; Thu, 02 Jul 2020 09:12:09 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726140AbgGBQLU (ORCPT + 99 others); Thu, 2 Jul 2020 12:11:20 -0400 Received: from foss.arm.com ([217.140.110.172]:39468 "EHLO foss.arm.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726082AbgGBQLU (ORCPT ); Thu, 2 Jul 2020 12:11:20 -0400 Received: from usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (unknown [10.121.207.14]) by usa-sjc-mx-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 87B131FB; Thu, 2 Jul 2020 09:11:19 -0700 (PDT) Received: from e113632-lin (e113632-lin.cambridge.arm.com [10.1.194.46]) by usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 3F8083F71E; Thu, 2 Jul 2020 09:11:18 -0700 (PDT) References: <20200702144258.19326-1-vincent.guittot@linaro.org> User-agent: mu4e 0.9.17; emacs 26.3 From: Valentin Schneider To: Vincent Guittot Cc: mingo@redhat.com, peterz@infradead.org, juri.lelli@redhat.com, dietmar.eggemann@arm.com, rostedt@goodmis.org, bsegall@google.com, mgorman@suse.de, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] sched/fair: handle case of task_h_load() returning 0 In-reply-to: <20200702144258.19326-1-vincent.guittot@linaro.org> Date: Thu, 02 Jul 2020 17:11:15 +0100 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 02/07/20 15:42, Vincent Guittot wrote: > task_h_load() can return 0 in some situations like running stress-ng > mmapfork, which forks thousands of threads, in a sched group on a 224 cores > system. The load balance doesn't handle this correctly because > env->imbalance never decreases and it will stop pulling tasks only after > reaching loop_max, which can be equal to the number of running tasks of > the cfs. Make sure that imbalance will be decreased by at least 1. > > misfit task is the other feature that doesn't handle correctly such > situation although it's probably more difficult to face the problem > because of the smaller number of CPUs and running tasks on heterogenous > system. > > We can't simply ensure that task_h_load() returns at least one because it > would imply to handle underrun in other places. Nasty one, that... Random thought: isn't that the kind of thing we have scale_load() and scale_load_down() for? There's more uses of task_h_load() than I would like for this, but if we upscale its output (or introduce an upscaled variant), we could do something like: --- detach_tasks() { long imbalance = env->imbalance; if (env->migration_type == migrate_load) imbalance = scale_load(imbalance); while (!list_empty(tasks)) { /* ... */ switch (env->migration_type) { case migrate_load: load = task_h_load_upscaled(p); /* ... usual bits here ...*/ lsub_positive(&env->imbalance, load); break; /* ... */ } if (!scale_load_down(env->imbalance)) break; } } --- It's not perfect, and there's still the misfit situation to sort out - still, do you think this is something we could go towards? > > Signed-off-by: Vincent Guittot > --- > kernel/sched/fair.c | 18 +++++++++++++++++- > 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/kernel/sched/fair.c b/kernel/sched/fair.c > index 6fab1d17c575..62747c24aa9e 100644 > --- a/kernel/sched/fair.c > +++ b/kernel/sched/fair.c > @@ -4049,7 +4049,13 @@ static inline void update_misfit_status(struct task_struct *p, struct rq *rq) > return; > } > > - rq->misfit_task_load = task_h_load(p); > + /* > + * Make sure that misfit_task_load will not be null even if > + * task_h_load() returns 0. misfit_task_load is only used to select > + * rq with highest load so adding 1 will not modify the result > + * of the comparison. > + */ > + rq->misfit_task_load = task_h_load(p) + 1; > } > > #else /* CONFIG_SMP */ > @@ -7664,6 +7670,16 @@ static int detach_tasks(struct lb_env *env) > env->sd->nr_balance_failed <= env->sd->cache_nice_tries) > goto next; > > + /* > + * Depending of the number of CPUs and tasks and the > + * cgroup hierarchy, task_h_load() can return a null > + * value. Make sure that env->imbalance decreases > + * otherwise detach_tasks() will stop only after > + * detaching up to loop_max tasks. > + */ > + if (!load) > + load = 1; > + > env->imbalance -= load; > break;