Received: by 2002:a05:6902:102b:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id x11csp2035844ybt; Thu, 2 Jul 2020 22:09:59 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJyzFiRMbPSE9ap4rc8Kq6Uk+f0PBuJsq1RF3rgiBMeD9qRni6jsVSQKQ0NQZT2WHeeb5K6/ X-Received: by 2002:a17:906:c415:: with SMTP id u21mr30204331ejz.45.1593752998996; Thu, 02 Jul 2020 22:09:58 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1593752998; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=NdUPeM2mV4XrJiBPRTrHA8IGDZwqgBRIjRJqm0xWOzzIJdMZH+ZwhWWiGMV4L5cppy gFW4YEwrpdipjC7zJTETQkKZ3xATfKTEvN6FgHgmeHC2C2B2AC0pveOJBr6MmGBCCj77 rQUFs3HMxgmZenvO6M41ULXAgtqKBEjbtb/t8IngC1OF2Tp+D8qp7iA7lnyi/yJjOjbm ltyNnCVL7phgdMwjtBkub67ORV/H6tB03oeCytcvdGOYEi+N6F2fy+mYTHoHE2OxmwHc EVVW5Cxxfc9PpqFSynzAFTSBz74w9cbOTCoW3NUnJqepsBxQt4Hwxk3ujiAP3h2pjNO+ q6aw== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:references:in-reply-to:message-id:date :subject:to:from; bh=SiLoijHnbR7Lss4PgKnjJX0vO1Dn5y/gs314Yvctfxc=; b=aMtqkqvcnEPYVoC1BdOziSRvXl1GpR3mm9JCis91n5mirGTAS//2IQYX+v/Gher2Rq qCfP4EHRJK/ozlxeXuvAmZ9c+5y3wVW7HSJsDnvNKeunFCAChTr1I5TA3UPXmZjkdUUh s2RbOwqHu1qh6jE3EhXvMHCWUowe3+CopayCM1HNoOpli3VZ/RWafu4QiThLrFveKAX1 78fUF3iF9iOLTP/gARNUaNyqAYIwKJk+5YXvMWNu5myhbMOLP1DGDZOiZKaZ7CsNS6em hUah6UdzclIV609NdxHQr9AzsxO4/naqyrPok8MnanZum4PdVMA5JiJDxePPa45oHTJn XDDQ== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=alibaba.com Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [23.128.96.18]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id k22si7511677ejv.685.2020.07.02.22.09.35; Thu, 02 Jul 2020 22:09:58 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=alibaba.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726724AbgGCFJH (ORCPT + 99 others); Fri, 3 Jul 2020 01:09:07 -0400 Received: from out30-54.freemail.mail.aliyun.com ([115.124.30.54]:57267 "EHLO out30-54.freemail.mail.aliyun.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726418AbgGCFIr (ORCPT ); Fri, 3 Jul 2020 01:08:47 -0400 X-Alimail-AntiSpam: AC=PASS;BC=-1|-1;BR=01201311R421e4;CH=green;DM=||false|;DS=||;FP=0|-1|-1|-1|0|-1|-1|-1;HT=e01e01422;MF=alex.shi@linux.alibaba.com;NM=1;PH=DS;RN=16;SR=0;TI=SMTPD_---0U1Y4LGX_1593752912; Received: from alexshi-test.localdomain(mailfrom:alex.shi@linux.alibaba.com fp:SMTPD_---0U1Y4LGX_1593752912) by smtp.aliyun-inc.com(127.0.0.1); Fri, 03 Jul 2020 13:08:38 +0800 From: Alex Shi To: akpm@linux-foundation.org, mgorman@techsingularity.net, tj@kernel.org, hughd@google.com, khlebnikov@yandex-team.ru, daniel.m.jordan@oracle.com, yang.shi@linux.alibaba.com, willy@infradead.org, hannes@cmpxchg.org, lkp@intel.com, linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, cgroups@vger.kernel.org, shakeelb@google.com, iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com, richard.weiyang@gmail.com Subject: [PATCH v14 12/20] mm/lru: introduce TestClearPageLRU Date: Fri, 3 Jul 2020 13:07:45 +0800 Message-Id: <1593752873-4493-13-git-send-email-alex.shi@linux.alibaba.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 1.8.3.1 In-Reply-To: <1593752873-4493-1-git-send-email-alex.shi@linux.alibaba.com> References: <1593752873-4493-1-git-send-email-alex.shi@linux.alibaba.com> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Combine PageLRU check and ClearPageLRU into a function by new introduced func TestClearPageLRU. This function will be used as page isolation precondition to prevent other isolations some where else. Then there are may non PageLRU page on lru list, need to remove BUG checking accordingly. Hugh Dickins pointed that __page_cache_release and release_pages has no need to do atomic clear bit since no user on the page at that moment. and no need get_page() before lru bit clear in isolate_lru_page, since it '(1) Must be called with an elevated refcount on the page'. As Andrew Morton mentioned this change would dirty cacheline for page isn't on LRU. But the lost would be acceptable with Rong Chen report: https://lkml.org/lkml/2020/3/4/173 Suggested-by: Johannes Weiner Signed-off-by: Alex Shi Cc: Hugh Dickins Cc: Johannes Weiner Cc: Michal Hocko Cc: Vladimir Davydov Cc: Andrew Morton Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Cc: cgroups@vger.kernel.org Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org --- include/linux/page-flags.h | 1 + mm/mlock.c | 3 +-- mm/swap.c | 6 ++---- mm/vmscan.c | 26 +++++++++++--------------- 4 files changed, 15 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-) diff --git a/include/linux/page-flags.h b/include/linux/page-flags.h index 6be1aa559b1e..9554ed1387dc 100644 --- a/include/linux/page-flags.h +++ b/include/linux/page-flags.h @@ -326,6 +326,7 @@ static inline void page_init_poison(struct page *page, size_t size) PAGEFLAG(Dirty, dirty, PF_HEAD) TESTSCFLAG(Dirty, dirty, PF_HEAD) __CLEARPAGEFLAG(Dirty, dirty, PF_HEAD) PAGEFLAG(LRU, lru, PF_HEAD) __CLEARPAGEFLAG(LRU, lru, PF_HEAD) + TESTCLEARFLAG(LRU, lru, PF_HEAD) PAGEFLAG(Active, active, PF_HEAD) __CLEARPAGEFLAG(Active, active, PF_HEAD) TESTCLEARFLAG(Active, active, PF_HEAD) PAGEFLAG(Workingset, workingset, PF_HEAD) diff --git a/mm/mlock.c b/mm/mlock.c index f8736136fad7..228ba5a8e0a5 100644 --- a/mm/mlock.c +++ b/mm/mlock.c @@ -108,13 +108,12 @@ void mlock_vma_page(struct page *page) */ static bool __munlock_isolate_lru_page(struct page *page, bool getpage) { - if (PageLRU(page)) { + if (TestClearPageLRU(page)) { struct lruvec *lruvec; lruvec = mem_cgroup_page_lruvec(page, page_pgdat(page)); if (getpage) get_page(page); - ClearPageLRU(page); del_page_from_lru_list(page, lruvec, page_lru(page)); return true; } diff --git a/mm/swap.c b/mm/swap.c index c67699de4869..b24d5f69b93a 100644 --- a/mm/swap.c +++ b/mm/swap.c @@ -83,10 +83,9 @@ static void __page_cache_release(struct page *page) struct lruvec *lruvec; unsigned long flags; + __ClearPageLRU(page); spin_lock_irqsave(&pgdat->lru_lock, flags); lruvec = mem_cgroup_page_lruvec(page, pgdat); - VM_BUG_ON_PAGE(!PageLRU(page), page); - __ClearPageLRU(page); del_page_from_lru_list(page, lruvec, page_off_lru(page)); spin_unlock_irqrestore(&pgdat->lru_lock, flags); } @@ -878,9 +877,8 @@ void release_pages(struct page **pages, int nr) spin_lock_irqsave(&locked_pgdat->lru_lock, flags); } - lruvec = mem_cgroup_page_lruvec(page, locked_pgdat); - VM_BUG_ON_PAGE(!PageLRU(page), page); __ClearPageLRU(page); + lruvec = mem_cgroup_page_lruvec(page, locked_pgdat); del_page_from_lru_list(page, lruvec, page_off_lru(page)); } diff --git a/mm/vmscan.c b/mm/vmscan.c index c1c4259b4de5..18986fefd49b 100644 --- a/mm/vmscan.c +++ b/mm/vmscan.c @@ -1548,16 +1548,16 @@ int __isolate_lru_page(struct page *page, isolate_mode_t mode) { int ret = -EINVAL; - /* Only take pages on the LRU. */ - if (!PageLRU(page)) - return ret; - /* Compaction should not handle unevictable pages but CMA can do so */ if (PageUnevictable(page) && !(mode & ISOLATE_UNEVICTABLE)) return ret; ret = -EBUSY; + /* Only take pages on the LRU. */ + if (!PageLRU(page)) + return ret; + /* * To minimise LRU disruption, the caller can indicate that it only * wants to isolate pages it will be able to operate on without @@ -1671,8 +1671,6 @@ static unsigned long isolate_lru_pages(unsigned long nr_to_scan, page = lru_to_page(src); prefetchw_prev_lru_page(page, src, flags); - VM_BUG_ON_PAGE(!PageLRU(page), page); - nr_pages = compound_nr(page); total_scan += nr_pages; @@ -1769,21 +1767,19 @@ int isolate_lru_page(struct page *page) VM_BUG_ON_PAGE(!page_count(page), page); WARN_RATELIMIT(PageTail(page), "trying to isolate tail page"); - if (PageLRU(page)) { + if (TestClearPageLRU(page)) { pg_data_t *pgdat = page_pgdat(page); struct lruvec *lruvec; + int lru = page_lru(page); - spin_lock_irq(&pgdat->lru_lock); + get_page(page); lruvec = mem_cgroup_page_lruvec(page, pgdat); - if (PageLRU(page)) { - int lru = page_lru(page); - get_page(page); - ClearPageLRU(page); - del_page_from_lru_list(page, lruvec, lru); - ret = 0; - } + spin_lock_irq(&pgdat->lru_lock); + del_page_from_lru_list(page, lruvec, lru); spin_unlock_irq(&pgdat->lru_lock); + ret = 0; } + return ret; } -- 1.8.3.1