Received: by 2002:a05:6902:102b:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id x11csp2138705ybt; Fri, 3 Jul 2020 01:39:06 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJy86ArOa0Y5/8CIf7sZqOr0vZ3HbDtMymDijFSsQoKkHrOEVXqxxb2c+ihLgVaIUbiV0s4/ X-Received: by 2002:a17:906:ca57:: with SMTP id jx23mr29172025ejb.256.1593765546415; Fri, 03 Jul 2020 01:39:06 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1593765546; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=IibaJeOLvPxpwZSWnOQgwf8PojFf8Hd/vPy4oWKi2S1IG6DVbUIrrjX6/TL3g8jCB9 N/NdmYYWB1pELcKUygwyJpqKOXybLV/nV5iqc9f9B/iD5aPBCt9QgKxuzhNWUJUZTW74 aUoPyNc8Eh6Ls1BmYw/wn/VgvkdEiDiKKN4UspJgcHF60Q2Wby0UuUQIG8kUq+/Cdh+B 8aSjQ1d1zfH4+GfYrJgWdBKU+ggOPY1jh6WWEcBx+z43cT54q/0ZojJIIO/SDCNfygOS 61mSR6Mcyx2/lQjm/5REjWX1eWcKEcUu1XQPm6XNqSgAtlZavHJAv2sLyBCV8bFUWBGU 4Sbg== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to :mime-version:user-agent:date:message-id:from:cc:references:to :subject; bh=Y+Rks9Okrmpyu2+jki/chT52QIavVXD9Y1BHFX/kwPs=; b=c9sTqhrKTIozXuZuBNcuWDzF9qab1QpQcjzL5/h753UGv2SiaCUmfLM8k39uVR969r vaisntWESaDGos28fwQ8objf4nIB4xmy0mMNZlsjZI7j6wChsqWRO6qVmpEs/ypKkRRE aNCmQjS77heqKo6i1l25S7D9bMvKX/bXooxEkSfgpFnZh4uaQgK+O5p+NtuFKoX5uHLc wWOMUjibnOu9Ooer1QKAkgMMo4Vv9pawJ8pNkHpH4gyvoJPrKaOGSBCO9NjoitKXzoin 8tTRJMkFsi9959nI+jYl0o9bQUf12fQA996fAC7B82AUYf6BMJi+3TMQbSZVNScQTFq/ 0Q/w== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [23.128.96.18]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id lk3si7202444ejb.653.2020.07.03.01.38.43; Fri, 03 Jul 2020 01:39:06 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726129AbgGCIi1 (ORCPT + 99 others); Fri, 3 Jul 2020 04:38:27 -0400 Received: from szxga05-in.huawei.com ([45.249.212.191]:6815 "EHLO huawei.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1725648AbgGCIi1 (ORCPT ); Fri, 3 Jul 2020 04:38:27 -0400 Received: from DGGEMS411-HUB.china.huawei.com (unknown [172.30.72.58]) by Forcepoint Email with ESMTP id ADEDE261CCA698135E3D; Fri, 3 Jul 2020 16:38:23 +0800 (CST) Received: from [127.0.0.1] (10.174.176.220) by DGGEMS411-HUB.china.huawei.com (10.3.19.211) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 14.3.487.0; Fri, 3 Jul 2020 16:38:17 +0800 Subject: Re: [PATCH v10 0/5] support reserving crashkernel above 4G on arm64 kdump To: Bhupesh Sharma References: <20200703035816.31289-1-chenzhou10@huawei.com> CC: Thomas Gleixner , Ingo Molnar , RuiRui Yang , Baoquan He , Catalin Marinas , Will Deacon , James Morse , Rob Herring , Arnd Bergmann , John Donnelly , "Prabhakar Kushwaha" , , "Jonathan Corbet" , Simon Horman , , , , Linux Kernel Mailing List , linux-arm-kernel , kexec mailing list , Linux Doc Mailing List From: chenzhou Message-ID: <989e3b4f-4827-bb0f-5c3d-d9669c081c88@huawei.com> Date: Fri, 3 Jul 2020 16:38:15 +0800 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.7.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Originating-IP: [10.174.176.220] X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi Bhupesh, On 2020/7/3 15:26, Bhupesh Sharma wrote: > Hi Chen, > > On Fri, Jul 3, 2020 at 9:24 AM Chen Zhou wrote: >> This patch series enable reserving crashkernel above 4G in arm64. >> >> There are following issues in arm64 kdump: >> 1. We use crashkernel=X to reserve crashkernel below 4G, which will fail >> when there is no enough low memory. >> 2. Currently, crashkernel=Y@X can be used to reserve crashkernel above 4G, >> in this case, if swiotlb or DMA buffers are required, crash dump kernel >> will boot failure because there is no low memory available for allocation. >> 3. commit 1a8e1cef7603 ("arm64: use both ZONE_DMA and ZONE_DMA32") broken >> the arm64 kdump. If the memory reserved for crash dump kernel falled in >> ZONE_DMA32, the devices in crash dump kernel need to use ZONE_DMA will alloc >> fail. >> >> To solve these issues, introduce crashkernel=X,low to reserve specified >> size low memory. >> Crashkernel=X tries to reserve memory for the crash dump kernel under >> 4G. If crashkernel=Y,low is specified simultaneously, reserve spcified >> size low memory for crash kdump kernel devices firstly and then reserve >> memory above 4G. >> >> When crashkernel is reserved above 4G in memory and crashkernel=X,low >> is specified simultaneously, kernel should reserve specified size low memory >> for crash dump kernel devices. So there may be two crash kernel regions, one >> is below 4G, the other is above 4G. >> In order to distinct from the high region and make no effect to the use of >> kexec-tools, rename the low region as "Crash kernel (low)", and pass the >> low region by reusing DT property "linux,usable-memory-range". We made the low >> memory region as the last range of "linux,usable-memory-range" to keep >> compatibility with existing user-space and older kdump kernels. >> >> Besides, we need to modify kexec-tools: >> arm64: support more than one crash kernel regions(see [1]) >> >> Another update is document about DT property 'linux,usable-memory-range': >> schemas: update 'linux,usable-memory-range' node schema(see [2]) >> >> The previous changes and discussions can be retrieved from: >> >> Changes since [v9] >> - Patch 1 add Acked-by from Dave. >> - Update patch 5 according to Dave's comments. >> - Update chosen schema. >> >> Changes since [v8] >> - Reuse DT property "linux,usable-memory-range". >> Suggested by Rob, reuse DT property "linux,usable-memory-range" to pass the low >> memory region. >> - Fix kdump broken with ZONE_DMA reintroduced. >> - Update chosen schema. >> >> Changes since [v7] >> - Move x86 CRASH_ALIGN to 2M >> Suggested by Dave and do some test, move x86 CRASH_ALIGN to 2M. >> - Update Documentation/devicetree/bindings/chosen.txt. >> Add corresponding documentation to Documentation/devicetree/bindings/chosen.txt >> suggested by Arnd. >> - Add Tested-by from Jhon and pk. >> >> Changes since [v6] >> - Fix build errors reported by kbuild test robot. >> >> Changes since [v5] >> - Move reserve_crashkernel_low() into kernel/crash_core.c. >> - Delete crashkernel=X,high. >> - Modify crashkernel=X,low. >> If crashkernel=X,low is specified simultaneously, reserve spcified size low >> memory for crash kdump kernel devices firstly and then reserve memory above 4G. >> In addition, rename crashk_low_res as "Crash kernel (low)" for arm64, and then >> pass to crash dump kernel by DT property "linux,low-memory-range". >> - Update Documentation/admin-guide/kdump/kdump.rst. >> >> Changes since [v4] >> - Reimplement memblock_cap_memory_ranges for multiple ranges by Mike. >> >> Changes since [v3] >> - Add memblock_cap_memory_ranges back for multiple ranges. >> - Fix some compiling warnings. >> >> Changes since [v2] >> - Split patch "arm64: kdump: support reserving crashkernel above 4G" as >> two. Put "move reserve_crashkernel_low() into kexec_core.c" in a separate >> patch. >> >> Changes since [v1]: >> - Move common reserve_crashkernel_low() code into kernel/kexec_core.c. >> - Remove memblock_cap_memory_ranges() i added in v1 and implement that >> in fdt_enforce_memory_region(). >> There are at most two crash kernel regions, for two crash kernel regions >> case, we cap the memory range [min(regs[*].start), max(regs[*].end)] >> and then remove the memory range in the middle. >> >> [1]: http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/kexec/2020-June/020737.html >> [2]: https://github.com/robherring/dt-schema/pull/19 >> [v1]: https://lkml.org/lkml/2019/4/2/1174 >> [v2]: https://lkml.org/lkml/2019/4/9/86 >> [v3]: https://lkml.org/lkml/2019/4/9/306 >> [v4]: https://lkml.org/lkml/2019/4/15/273 >> [v5]: https://lkml.org/lkml/2019/5/6/1360 >> [v6]: https://lkml.org/lkml/2019/8/30/142 >> [v7]: https://lkml.org/lkml/2019/12/23/411 >> [v8]: https://lkml.org/lkml/2020/5/21/213 >> [v9]: https://lkml.org/lkml/2020/6/28/73 >> >> Chen Zhou (5): >> x86: kdump: move reserve_crashkernel_low() into crash_core.c >> arm64: kdump: reserve crashkenel above 4G for crash dump kernel >> arm64: kdump: add memory for devices by DT property >> linux,usable-memory-range >> arm64: kdump: fix kdump broken with ZONE_DMA reintroduced >> kdump: update Documentation about crashkernel on arm64 >> >> Documentation/admin-guide/kdump/kdump.rst | 14 ++- >> .../admin-guide/kernel-parameters.txt | 17 +++- >> arch/arm64/kernel/setup.c | 8 +- >> arch/arm64/mm/init.c | 74 ++++++++++++--- >> arch/x86/kernel/setup.c | 66 ++------------ >> include/linux/crash_core.h | 3 + >> include/linux/kexec.h | 2 - >> kernel/crash_core.c | 90 +++++++++++++++++++ >> kernel/kexec_core.c | 17 ---- >> 9 files changed, 197 insertions(+), 94 deletions(-) >> >> -- >> 2.20.1 > Thanks for the v10. > > 1. Seems this series is still broken on arm64 boards like ampere and > ThunderX2 (marvell) because of the ZONE_DMA32 related OOM seen while > booting kdump kernel. > Here are details about my environment: > > - Latest upstream Linus master branch (5.8.0-rc3) + your v10 patches. > - Latest upstream kexec-tools + your v4 patch. > > # dmesg | grep -i crash > [ 0.000000] crashkernel reserved: 0x00000000ca000000 - > 0x00000000ea000000 (512 MB) > [ 0.000000] Kernel command line: > BOOT_IMAGE=(hd13,gpt2)/vmlinuz-5.8.0-rc3+ > root=/dev/mapper/rhel_hpe--apache--cn99xx--09-root ro > rd.lvm.lv=rhel_hpe-apache-cn99xx-09/root > rd.lvm.lv=rhel_hpe-apache-cn99xx-09/swap crashkernel=512M > [ 58.917523] crashkernel=512M > > 2. Here is the OOM crash seen while booting the kdump kernel: > > [ 0.244724] DMA: preallocated 128 KiB GFP_KERNEL pool for atomic allocations > [ 0.251859] Unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at > virtual address 0000000000000188 > [ 0.260737] Mem abort info: > [ 0.263553] ESR = 0x96000006 > [ 0.266632] EC = 0x25: DABT (current EL), IL = 32 bits > [ 0.271994] SET = 0, FnV = 0 > [ 0.275074] EA = 0, S1PTW = 0 > [ 0.278239] Data abort info: > [ 0.281141] ISV = 0, ISS = 0x00000006 > [ 0.285010] CM = 0, WnR = 0 > [ 0.288001] [0000000000000188] user address but active_mm is swapper > [ 0.294420] Internal error: Oops: 96000006 [#1] SMP > [ 0.299344] Modules linked in: > [ 0.302424] CPU: 0 PID: 1 Comm: swapper/0 Not tainted 5.8.0-rc3+ #8 > [ 0.308753] Hardware name: HPE Apollo 70 /C01_APACHE_MB > , BIOS L50_5.13_1.11 06/18/2019 > [ 0.318599] pstate: 00400009 (nzcv daif +PAN -UAO BTYPE=--) > [ 0.324228] pc : mem_cgroup_get_nr_swap_pages+0x2c/0x60 > [ 0.329506] lr : shrink_lruvec+0x404/0x4f8 > [ 0.333638] sp : fffffe0012b8f840 > [ 0.336979] x29: fffffe0012b8f840 x28: fffffe00116b3000 > [ 0.342343] x27: fffffe0012b8fb00 x26: 0000000000000020 > [ 0.347707] x25: 0000000000000000 x24: fffffc0069fffe28 > [ 0.353070] x23: 0000000000000000 x22: 0000000000000000 > [ 0.358433] x21: 000000000000003c x20: fffffe0012b8fa98 > [ 0.363796] x19: 0000000000000000 x18: 0000000000000010 > [ 0.369159] x17: 00000000bd8afee8 x16: 000000001260aa76 > [ 0.374523] x15: ffffffffffffffff x14: fffffe00116b3988 > [ 0.379886] x13: fffffe0092b8faa7 x12: fffffe0012b8faaf > [ 0.385248] x11: fffffe00116f1000 x10: fffffe0012b8fa30 > [ 0.390612] x9 : fffffe0010244ebc x8 : 0000000000000000 > [ 0.395975] x7 : 0000000000000020 x6 : 00000000ffff8ae3 > [ 0.401338] x5 : 0000000000000000 x4 : fffffc004da89000 > [ 0.406701] x3 : 0000000000000000 x2 : 0000000000000000 > [ 0.412064] x1 : fffffe00116bf000 x0 : 0000000000000000 > [ 0.417427] Call trace: > [ 0.419891] mem_cgroup_get_nr_swap_pages+0x2c/0x60 > [ 0.424815] shrink_node+0x1a8/0x688 > [ 0.428420] do_try_to_free_pages+0xe8/0x448 > [ 0.432729] try_to_free_pages+0x110/0x230 > [ 0.436863] __alloc_pages_slowpath.constprop.106+0x2b8/0xb48 > [ 0.442666] __alloc_pages_nodemask+0x2ac/0x2f8 > [ 0.447239] alloc_page_interleave+0x20/0x90 > [ 0.451548] alloc_pages_current+0xdc/0xf8 > [ 0.455681] atomic_pool_expand+0x60/0x210 > [ 0.459817] __dma_atomic_pool_init+0x50/0xa4 > [ 0.464214] dma_atomic_pool_init+0xac/0x158 > [ 0.468522] do_one_initcall+0x50/0x218 > [ 0.472393] kernel_init_freeable+0x22c/0x2d0 > [ 0.476792] kernel_init+0x18/0x110 > [ 0.480310] ret_from_fork+0x10/0x18 > [ 0.483918] Code: 350001e3 d503201f f9450024 1400000a (f940c401) > [ 0.490074] ---[ end trace e5a9147af159e580 ]--- > [ 0.494734] Kernel panic - not syncing: Fatal exception > [ 0.500010] Rebooting in 10 seconds.. > > 3. Did you test your patch with a simple crashkernel=512M command line > (without using the crashkernel hi/lo or crashkernel=X@Y format)? > > Anyway, since this implementation still needs rework, we can go ahead > with the arrangement of limiting the crashkernel allocation in > ZONE_DMA range (as I suggested in another patch series > ) in > the meanwhile. to ensure the upstream kernel can still support kdump > on arm64 boards where it was working before the ZONE_DMA32 changes > were introduced for arm64. > > Please let me know your views, Thanks for your test and sharing your views. I have no questions about the 1 and 2 you mentioned. I charity the issue in my patch 4 and suggest to use the parameter like "crashkernel=X crashkernel=Y,low" if CONFIG_ZONE_DMA is enabled. I also document this in doc in patch 5. I choose to address the issue based on the "reserving crashkernel above 4G", because we just need to adjust the low memory limit instead of limiting the whole crahshkernel to ZONE_DMA. details: https://lkml.org/lkml/2020/7/3/64 But you are right, arm64 kdump is broken for long time, including the issue you addressed "Append new variables to vmcoreinfo (TCR_EL1.T1SZ for arm64 and MAX_PHYSMEM_BITS for all archs)". I agree with you to make it work as soon as possible. Ping James, Will, any other comments about this patch series? Thanks, Chen Zhou > > Thanks, > Bhupesh > > > . >