Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Sun, 12 Nov 2000 20:25:03 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Sun, 12 Nov 2000 20:24:54 -0500 Received: from jalon.able.es ([212.97.163.2]:60318 "EHLO jalon.able.es") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Sun, 12 Nov 2000 20:24:39 -0500 Date: Mon, 13 Nov 2000 02:24:32 +0100 From: "J . A . Magallon" To: Anton Altaparmakov Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: Linux-2.2.x-BUG(?) memmory not detected Message-ID: <20001113022432.C886@werewolf.able.es> Reply-To: jamagallon@able.es In-Reply-To: <5.0.0.25.2.20001113002439.0572d070@pop.cus.cam.ac.uk> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7BIT In-Reply-To: <5.0.0.25.2.20001113002439.0572d070@pop.cus.cam.ac.uk>; from aia21@cam.ac.uk on Mon, Nov 13, 2000 at 01:43:44 +0100 X-Mailer: Balsa 1.0.pre5 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, 13 Nov 2000 01:43:44 Anton Altaparmakov wrote: > Hi, > > Just noticed that both 2.2.18pre21 and RedHat-7.0-patched-2.2.16 kernels > only detect 64Mb out of 192Mb RAM on my Dual Celeron/Intel 440GX chipset > based workstation. - I haven't tried any other 2.2 kernels on that > particular PC so maybe this is a general 2.2.x thing. > > The setup is one 64Mb SDRAM and one 128Mb SDRAM so it would seem that the > 128Mb one is not detected at all. > > All 2.3/2.4 kernels I have tried have always detected the full 192Mb RAM. > It's a bug, but in the mobo. Some motherboards lie about its installed ram. 2.3+ kernels have a workaround for detection, but in 2.2 you still have to manually add in your lilo.conf file. -- Juan Antonio Magallon Lacarta #> cd /pub mailto:jamagallon@able.es #> more beer - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/