Received: by 2002:a05:6902:102b:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id x11csp2322612ybt; Fri, 3 Jul 2020 06:29:15 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJz5NL7QSV7eL0oXdpObrrTw5Y4AGQGW05ZzeiddQfla9HV50ETC/p3lazUcfJpcntm6/f17 X-Received: by 2002:a17:906:fa9a:: with SMTP id lt26mr22774318ejb.502.1593782954937; Fri, 03 Jul 2020 06:29:14 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1593782954; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=sSv392lW0QjyYxByfnvLegtgpgntv1ZVavj4jsrh26lO2ukpltKPqASXjzIbwvEzQb f4O6x0wn1BFUSc1R3aJFhQqPVdAwtGcdGFf4UGeuCVqFpMcIYVNl/yMmStSTt1ffiwcB rHby16KvYTkHqBy2VxAktRUAJeKtlsAu/y3DXY4iVLIiaS59t+iUBizZxm0QnBVsEFxd P85vMo7iftiii6aXxzwUS7T9KivBlFzhhcK/BnEqVSLNxFzcAy071FRjk6Vaa3b+CczT ukRI4yY+Q94zw+ZfdiIHwpQng9Z45u6u39rl7NlxKVz9pJFT7vE2PZohNhWwpMPvunFv gRpA== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:user-agent:in-reply-to :content-disposition:mime-version:references:message-id:subject:cc :to:from:date; bh=SNEwqEujuN4+5ge1yA6ND+2HGhpP849YXbhKgKdB93k=; b=asvafqMOIHAz2FpomWfa9ovvjM32M9HJh+fdFI797vAiVUwLb8VZaX1944rdiJxEqu Lpt4dbTPggffoLuNrOZQmnf2W3QQI0XrxIwjQLMtGWTO7iAmexveYqWpJ+BboF0Jd8WS zGu2EbuM/y7mc9e97pGQzFqp4LWrcy71vxx/r8BZDVpArA2iTwCZkDRDHeykHqc+eGfG IZsXs1flSHRjbScEBWUBgVMjGndHXXJBYy8e9TaMlD/lo06TPEycBdPDe+oMQkfL6QCC ZiaVGf6QHwmQNVHHCPu60jTVMQbpA2bxtH5nU29lpaQoB7/1enSirOaoJJHUN3YUYlUI 7OhQ== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [23.128.96.18]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id n7si7807345ejk.154.2020.07.03.06.28.51; Fri, 03 Jul 2020 06:29:14 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726324AbgGCN0H (ORCPT + 99 others); Fri, 3 Jul 2020 09:26:07 -0400 Received: from mail5.windriver.com ([192.103.53.11]:33602 "EHLO mail5.wrs.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726022AbgGCN0G (ORCPT ); Fri, 3 Jul 2020 09:26:06 -0400 Received: from ALA-HCA.corp.ad.wrs.com (ala-hca.corp.ad.wrs.com [147.11.189.40]) by mail5.wrs.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPS id 063DNHqc002307 (version=TLSv1 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL); Fri, 3 Jul 2020 06:23:27 -0700 Received: from yow-pgortmak-d1.corp.ad.wrs.com (128.224.56.57) by ALA-HCA.corp.ad.wrs.com (147.11.189.40) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 14.3.487.0; Fri, 3 Jul 2020 06:23:06 -0700 Received: by yow-pgortmak-d1.corp.ad.wrs.com (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 1A1512E0381; Fri, 3 Jul 2020 09:23:06 -0400 (EDT) Date: Fri, 3 Jul 2020 09:23:06 -0400 From: Paul Gortmaker To: Dave Jones , Linux Kernel , , , , Linus Torvalds CC: Michal Kubecek , "Paul E. McKenney" , Thomas Gleixner Subject: Re: weird loadavg on idle machine post 5.7 Message-ID: <20200703132305.GA25509@windriver.com> References: <20200702171548.GA11813@codemonkey.org.uk> <20200702211555.GA27819@windriver.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20200702211555.GA27819@windriver.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.24 (2015-08-30) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org [Re: weird loadavg on idle machine post 5.7] On 02/07/2020 (Thu 17:15) Paul Gortmaker wrote: > [weird loadavg on idle machine post 5.7] On 02/07/2020 (Thu 13:15) Dave Jones wrote: [...] > > both implicated this commit: > > > > commit c6e7bd7afaeb3af55ffac122828035f1c01d1d7b (refs/bisect/bad) > > Author: Peter Zijlstra > > Date: Sun May 24 21:29:55 2020 +0100 > > > > sched/core: Optimize ttwu() spinning on p->on_cpu > > I was down to 10 commits roughly above and below this guy before hearing > you were working the same problem. > > I just got this guy to reveal a false load after a 2h test as well. > I want to let the one underneath soak overnight just to also confirm it > is "good" - so that is pending. As per above, I ran a 12h test overnight on 505b8af5891 and it seems fine. Every other "bad" bisect point failed in 7h or less. So my testing seems to give the same result as Dave. Paul. -- root@t5610:/home/paul/git/linux-head# [1]- Done nohup tools/testing/selftests/rcutorture/bin/kvm.sh --cpus 24 --duration 720 --configs TREE03 --trust-make > /tmp/kvm.sh.out 2>&1 root@t5610:/home/paul/git/linux-head# uptime 09:10:56 up 13:12, 2 users, load average: 0.00, 0.00, 0.14 root@t5610:/home/paul/git/linux-head# cat /proc/version Linux version 5.7.0-rc6-00029-gd505b8af5891 (paul@t5610) (gcc version 9.3.0 (Ubuntu 9.3.0-10ubuntu2), GNU ld (GNU Binutils for Ubuntu) 2.34) #2 SMP Thu Jul 2 18:55:40 EDT 2020