Received: by 2002:a05:6902:102b:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id x11csp2488337ybt; Fri, 3 Jul 2020 10:12:13 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJzryXQBIT0LXTZvpP9jihgHvntQHIq3xVlU7h0VL9Yy6S9c0MrQcCGb6DYl/QH199fCXmt9 X-Received: by 2002:a50:d78f:: with SMTP id w15mr43566910edi.245.1593796332878; Fri, 03 Jul 2020 10:12:12 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1593796332; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=STRrQc4Pl2531IN0KOttorzenTgUd0s0bk+ityASrrX17PJW4q683vxSylj5AXF2Pm hmjLgNhwHL0PKG1keYqspAADC4LJfZvqRHzqPuJeXo1mwUI7zpZNjh0/Z6h81NxnOKKj ahgcwYd5wcDtzfsZiHQFV+Ha/maacSBkAEsJJrZp2PtM6EQKgc4NugNX+XpI2HA6hHeb v0Ke/Yf5Js7TLlxZyWADafS0hCe+Mc09saNm69dQ8vtJEGg1iXd7BN6BWVChvdvmQFxk B9pc9jc3XCe0M76aYUraXBGhMmSgD+7gcJTHE5nN6wFZKBiA/uTKaGSdMwG3JnYLK7WH mm1w== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:user-agent:in-reply-to :content-disposition:mime-version:references:message-id:subject:cc :to:date:from:dkim-signature; bh=oeo5CXQ+MIvI9X/KqYCM4k7p1aIl5c+gDkE9upkp9MI=; b=QHcb8921EoU8eoIavQmwkudUaKa6gP5R0gx0yOzixYs5jbrSL3YHTC+ioZYHhvnxZF CLYCRQjLkefbW1NUMjbX2d1ZVry+3FTqHdfz6rgS2yrvSYSEiU99HduNq0yAIQ4EL7ru pEPhR7/O+f3xSTXutwvnet0+JmEv0T9i7JN7AXZebwE7oXr/PHDEgtFGjxpn/fT61oy4 lAtBfz9PQuub2ybCZ+sI2oPF2yMABDd+kUQWWBCcUG+CpOeiNW9CLqI3LlUW4w/2rPZK cXU4joK7mJ1zPopc3ddwiLBDiOoJgyp6WDVm2VP6BS1Poo4AaO10cUoDoHJ7Tcv22+SN 80QQ== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@gmail.com header.s=20161025 header.b=mEMP61SI; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=QUARANTINE dis=NONE) header.from=gmail.com Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [23.128.96.18]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id t26si8564902edt.427.2020.07.03.10.11.50; Fri, 03 Jul 2020 10:12:12 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@gmail.com header.s=20161025 header.b=mEMP61SI; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=QUARANTINE dis=NONE) header.from=gmail.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726802AbgGCRJs (ORCPT + 99 others); Fri, 3 Jul 2020 13:09:48 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:39446 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726752AbgGCRJr (ORCPT ); Fri, 3 Jul 2020 13:09:47 -0400 Received: from mail-lj1-x243.google.com (mail-lj1-x243.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::243]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7D7ADC061794 for ; Fri, 3 Jul 2020 10:09:47 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-lj1-x243.google.com with SMTP id q7so24551577ljm.1 for ; Fri, 03 Jul 2020 10:09:47 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=from:date:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=oeo5CXQ+MIvI9X/KqYCM4k7p1aIl5c+gDkE9upkp9MI=; b=mEMP61SIuM9rZ2VcziXZ8sjhv97O3D7uYgQPh2Um702rlJHdKNixH5LCCtCg7ma1SK Oe3zPfpvFhu+Cv5ZqvWjOFV1uDqzLNg+ExJq9hU+m79YCWUBEO64+s/hZbtTAGAay2oy 2PGSxpKM2IxdqnGoKcoavB3H6rZ32aXaoy7w5/+ySMDQtaBV5sgGj/4gGfzGBNkF0v5+ bRmWBs95NGoUhvstuU11hyiken5HwroxhW/l/LpNc6YF8VVKFwOhXitXHD0w6xj6XPGg yUOOP27qkxFgSt0TZzbuvc5QvfVS492+FwDJEy/+qPGacBpDJU+wBLco5cAe3glwyJbb tYSw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:date:to:cc:subject:message-id:references :mime-version:content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=oeo5CXQ+MIvI9X/KqYCM4k7p1aIl5c+gDkE9upkp9MI=; b=pAxqEI/FUGCasfa2aXpOGfb3HPwbe8UJdnWH5SECC1KzZtP1qQYaDXgWTUH9XLC6Wf +dBeY1D/TBp4bKgKO8/3rAbtbdem0uZP/ehgli6Js1zWQh+tv6eo0SQdALca8SiLhvoJ NSh/lntUahDmFpc01RydWMHjbxhcIOjlcxPwB4fmk3rHTc5eaymrKkQ53WXAs8llEU56 6gZYl0SGPp+lWe7ekW/E846jTbo576Ijsk2HYFp47jAj74PM94QwlkezRpkzgF0h4uA4 jqseikhOvxF/ycXBT6bg7t+UorvFrlnIMUMT5h7JUBQu7AJGGWQ6OFHrp3eG3q03NS2+ WZ4w== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM530eZIkUrg87le7ES8+ookAfRO9lKjV7L9j3C8bkJMxgpBTfrcG2 3btWcB6sKgSqoFiAa0G5lYo= X-Received: by 2002:a05:651c:30b:: with SMTP id a11mr15444314ljp.47.1593796185996; Fri, 03 Jul 2020 10:09:45 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pc636 (h5ef52e31.seluork.dyn.perspektivbredband.net. [94.245.46.49]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id a22sm4842885lfg.96.2020.07.03.10.09.44 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Fri, 03 Jul 2020 10:09:45 -0700 (PDT) From: Uladzislau Rezki X-Google-Original-From: Uladzislau Rezki Date: Fri, 3 Jul 2020 19:09:41 +0200 To: Peter Zijlstra Cc: Uladzislau Rezki , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, Andrew Morton , Linus Torvalds , GregKroah-Hartmangregkh@linuxfoundation.org Subject: Re: nr_cpu_ids vs AMD 3970x(32 physical CPUs) Message-ID: <20200703170941.GA4372@pc636> References: <20200703155749.GA6255@pc636> <20200703165627.GG4781@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20200703165627.GG4781@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, Jul 03, 2020 at 06:56:27PM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote: > On Fri, Jul 03, 2020 at 05:57:49PM +0200, Uladzislau Rezki wrote: > > Hello, folk. > > > > I have a system based on AMD 3970x CPUs. It has 32 physical cores > > and 64 threads. It seems that "nr_cpu_ids" variable is not correctly > > set on latest 5.8-rc3 kernel. Please have a look below on dmesg output: > > > > > > urezki@pc638:~$ sudo dmesg | grep 128 > > [ 0.000000] IOAPIC[0]: apic_id 128, version 33, address 0xfec00000, GSI 0-23 > > [ 0.000000] smpboot: Allowing 128 CPUs, 64 hotplug CPUs > > This is your BIOS saying it needs 128 ids, 64 of which are 'empty'. > > I have a box like that as well, if it bothers you boot with: > "possible_cpus=64" or something. > OK, i got it. I thought that "cpu_possible_mask" strictly follows the rule: the number of CPUs in a system that physically are present. Thanks, Peter! -- Vlad Rezki