Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Thu, 25 Oct 2001 18:34:43 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Thu, 25 Oct 2001 18:34:33 -0400 Received: from Expansa.sns.it ([192.167.206.189]:10511 "EHLO Expansa.sns.it") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Thu, 25 Oct 2001 18:34:21 -0400 Date: Fri, 26 Oct 2001 00:35:03 +0200 (CEST) From: Luigi Genoni To: CaT cc: Marton Kadar , Subject: Re: concurrent VM subsystems In-Reply-To: <20011026003515.A1341@zip.com.au> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Obviously I was not meaning that desktops have not to be stable, but they are not subjects to long uptimes, at less usually, so page aging is, how can I say in correct english?, dealing with different conditions... Luigi On Fri, 26 Oct 2001, CaT wrote: > On Thu, Oct 25, 2001 at 03:06:51PM +0200, Luigi Genoni wrote: > > I already exposed my opinion, and both Andrea and Rik know it very well. > > The VM for servers needs to be predictable, for desktops needs to be as > > fast as possible, also if it is a little less predictable and stable (who > > cares if you reboot you desktop once every two days?). > > It doesn't matter if it's every 2 days or 2 years if it does it just > when you're doing something that must NOT be interrupted and you lose > a buttload of work. Stability is important in both a server AND desktop > environment. > > -- > CaT "As you can expect it's really affecting my sex life. I can't help > it. Each time my wife initiates sex, these ejaculating hippos keep > floating through my mind." > - Mohd. Binatang bin Goncang, Singapore Zoological Gardens > - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/