Received: by 2002:a05:6902:102b:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id x11csp2724795ybt; Fri, 3 Jul 2020 17:32:43 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJxXCxHyvvzkqb0g89ozR9IqWydRl5yMd+YkCK2m8BOZU9iVwiD6/BTYwbaGSX5E6s83FAFb X-Received: by 2002:a17:906:e215:: with SMTP id gf21mr28571393ejb.310.1593822763082; Fri, 03 Jul 2020 17:32:43 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1593822763; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=zKWsCiNOom29xuFvqVx0Yc3LdNpbm8yokriJVpvz8l9Mxlp4NKqt05cCB4s74cEOEZ Osldj3f2er3DEKAL0xog4pSUFkrQU2DGEkk7Nyz9cMCTRw3/VZ9mc2wYJsXOE/PI2ZXs 9ymaLuoEpZJ+Ho3bZeLVFs/39MZl7NuyZLqnjm0vkTnlXLLr8m9TGD6MnZhk0VHV5oTG HU3bkXb/HKpmPfzDQtsxhxMDwxs1AJWnCcnViOdKzVpgiVuhhPObUG9J1cBDzfu1tAzd f87hfX16x0UEF9RQdQZhIor7AfKATMzAv5Sn8r+tr8hsBBKFqvfM5wAeBvL7CHthX0TJ ecWw== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:content-transfer-encoding :content-language:in-reply-to:mime-version:user-agent:date :message-id:from:references:cc:to:subject:ironport-sdr:ironport-sdr; bh=hz3ejXRwcWflXdcUf1L8BDkvZOQLu0fLVT6gY5A7fP4=; b=U0iTh+Il4dQ//UGuehtK9Z2oOiGGPYUaBJ61QMKhzRPZE8Re9GC8ibfbDcgfIcB6Fv C3K9RzB5OF9hS1lan7k7xCQoTiGzgtx5csNdqa94Iwr/ONr3P87ffE/CGlPtjjjdomSD 3NWyi0VAOYL65Jg8bGm+0FZ0LbsoN0CLFjvRG+eIZJRUPp9Ri3yrTv/IpMlXumsFFPol QHhLvv8sulx45engFnU7VEHZ0oSPwCnf4n5SaAFiSuKdaXR4R7qO46+vj6vhQNiJ/D5P 68S5WZAitq7UOVclWWT7hFBI1lk/yy5W6/JaQlc8PgMd50If7L0gNjy1mexlHpvoOaxw XRrw== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=intel.com Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [23.128.96.18]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id dt5si11792564ejc.335.2020.07.03.17.32.19; Fri, 03 Jul 2020 17:32:43 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=intel.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726858AbgGDAb4 (ORCPT + 99 others); Fri, 3 Jul 2020 20:31:56 -0400 Received: from mga09.intel.com ([134.134.136.24]:16368 "EHLO mga09.intel.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726455AbgGDAb4 (ORCPT ); Fri, 3 Jul 2020 20:31:56 -0400 IronPort-SDR: KNqiw7vDRl+p8aTyrqOP+DKw26giIdrsFQHCMVqcSdxMgWBMV89Jv7S5yocFFpbCpFuNBqXiSb 7hEzZHPpW/vg== X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6000,8403,9671"; a="148729015" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.75,309,1589266800"; d="scan'208";a="148729015" X-Amp-Result: SKIPPED(no attachment in message) X-Amp-File-Uploaded: False Received: from fmsmga001.fm.intel.com ([10.253.24.23]) by orsmga102.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 03 Jul 2020 17:31:55 -0700 IronPort-SDR: JzyjzUa3vjpZ7phI+De/J0ZpzJFffdHOFxYHuCU95O2bZy70y4BwCdUeWO/fRgZ8vITfVUhRs6 Nbb5dopLHOXg== X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.75,309,1589266800"; d="scan'208";a="387713849" Received: from whu15-mobl.ccr.corp.intel.com (HELO [10.254.213.227]) ([10.254.213.227]) by fmsmga001.fm.intel.com with ESMTP; 03 Jul 2020 17:31:51 -0700 Subject: Re: [PATCH] perf evsel: Don't set sample_regs_intr/sample_regs_user for dummy event To: Jiri Olsa Cc: acme@kernel.org, jolsa@kernel.org, peterz@infradead.org, mingo@redhat.com, alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com, Linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, ak@linux.intel.com, kan.liang@intel.com, yao.jin@intel.com, irogers@google.com, Adrian Hunter References: <20200703004215.24418-1-yao.jin@linux.intel.com> <20200703110042.GA3282312@krava> From: "Jin, Yao" Message-ID: <9fa0bd83-b21e-7bc2-af81-799f8e99f73b@linux.intel.com> Date: Sat, 4 Jul 2020 08:31:50 +0800 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.10.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20200703110042.GA3282312@krava> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi Jiri, On 7/3/2020 7:00 PM, Jiri Olsa wrote: > On Fri, Jul 03, 2020 at 08:42:15AM +0800, Jin Yao wrote: >> Since commit 0a892c1c9472 ("perf record: Add dummy event during system wide synthesis"), >> a dummy event is added to capture mmaps. >> >> But if we run perf-record as, >> >> # perf record -e cycles:p -IXMM0 -a -- sleep 1 >> Error: >> dummy:HG: PMU Hardware doesn't support sampling/overflow-interrupts. Try 'perf stat' >> >> The issue is, if we enable the extended regs (-IXMM0), but the >> pmu->capabilities is not set with PERF_PMU_CAP_EXTENDED_REGS, the kernel >> will return -EOPNOTSUPP error. >> >> See following code pieces. >> >> /* in kernel/events/core.c */ >> static int perf_try_init_event(struct pmu *pmu, struct perf_event *event) >> >> { >> .... >> if (!(pmu->capabilities & PERF_PMU_CAP_EXTENDED_REGS) && >> has_extended_regs(event)) >> ret = -EOPNOTSUPP; >> .... >> } >> >> For software dummy event, the PMU should be not set with >> PERF_PMU_CAP_EXTENDED_REGS. But unfortunately in current code, the dummy >> event has possibility to be set with PERF_REG_EXTENDED_MASK bit. >> >> In evsel__config, /* tools/perf/util/evsel.c */ >> >> if (opts->sample_intr_regs) { >> attr->sample_regs_intr = opts->sample_intr_regs; >> } >> >> If we use -IXMM0, the attr>sample_regs_intr will be set with >> PERF_REG_EXTENDED_MASK bit. >> >> It doesn't make sense to set attr->sample_regs_intr for a >> software dummy event. >> >> This patch adds dummy event checking before setting >> attr->sample_regs_intr. >> >> After: >> # ./perf record -e cycles:p -IXMM0 -a -- sleep 1 >> [ perf record: Woken up 1 times to write data ] >> [ perf record: Captured and wrote 0.413 MB perf.data (45 samples) ] > > LGTM, Adrian (cc-ed) just added another check to the same place, > but it looks like both of them should be there: > > https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20200630133935.11150-2-adrian.hunter@intel.com/ > > jirka > Thanks Jiri! Yes, it looks like both of checks should be added here. So do I post v2 (just rebase) once Adrian's patch gets merged? Thanks Jin Yao >> >> Fixes: 0a892c1c9472 ("perf record: Add dummy event during system wide synthesis") >> Signed-off-by: Jin Yao >> --- >> tools/perf/util/evsel.c | 4 ++-- >> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) >> >> diff --git a/tools/perf/util/evsel.c b/tools/perf/util/evsel.c >> index 96e5171dce41..df3315543e86 100644 >> --- a/tools/perf/util/evsel.c >> +++ b/tools/perf/util/evsel.c >> @@ -1020,12 +1020,12 @@ void evsel__config(struct evsel *evsel, struct record_opts *opts, >> if (callchain && callchain->enabled && !evsel->no_aux_samples) >> evsel__config_callchain(evsel, opts, callchain); >> >> - if (opts->sample_intr_regs) { >> + if (opts->sample_intr_regs && !is_dummy_event(evsel)) { >> attr->sample_regs_intr = opts->sample_intr_regs; >> evsel__set_sample_bit(evsel, REGS_INTR); >> } >> >> - if (opts->sample_user_regs) { >> + if (opts->sample_user_regs && !is_dummy_event(evsel)) { >> attr->sample_regs_user |= opts->sample_user_regs; >> evsel__set_sample_bit(evsel, REGS_USER); >> } >> -- >> 2.17.1 >> >