Received: by 2002:a05:6902:102b:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id x11csp3416049ybt; Sat, 4 Jul 2020 16:52:15 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJx+iurnEa07wATy+Gvn8mZxFaF5yxlI7wRHIaHLH9ml1K1v1voiiyjyzb21yI8gfOcZYWtx X-Received: by 2002:a17:907:6fc:: with SMTP id yh28mr37620600ejb.267.1593906734912; Sat, 04 Jul 2020 16:52:14 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1593906734; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=vftZvm3ZD88c/mkc2mVLeGHXuFRQHdviPiIuqJUMQLUw5eUBwEuAoxtCv+jjVUdqNr fMAizZuLKFqxUZ+FgPhj1TAtSXmTcjAjpx9bsSrJBrWOQUY+8CsO9NTyt0PhWFh1F01/ N4l9zAOHVriX/2zU2j3V2MJz5CUHbZFsmOiSLDkRd5BrCPwBhksWlaXehwIct5iAs0EF XDL+ISFgtfA1uJseZwWpZ1N7wNx68OV5YPLQFvWzmooon/U9P0vG9p2piXg3stLOX/9a B8BsoDsrHfS81j8P/e6WAlFbUbMLpI0udxAlTB48QH3J+jGv2w8Z86RzZRpXrYE99feI a7AQ== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:mime-version:message-id:date:in-reply-to :subject:cc:to:from:user-agent:references; bh=Sy4bsxxlOu9dilLTCsvk2wUmE1Eb2X/f4mAnE1FRzZs=; b=yFghvJu91DbQL4pYKjs1Xelw6wUHglWahHBjo+8bPh0W4CDX/4TgxeRcZ2tWZ/9gFr oTqskNzOBnC6Ah1i/i9xeg1X6ZnGLfaOGn6updhQGc5EIz94YlIFh313eKx4OTBKcSjc ACbgzQe5kFu61wKEyRhqK6dPvuSeCs/D/8lXzboicH3XvqKNrx+ezkc4L/3tT5LbODFU Bxpl2WyNx28BIhsV51hWwLWHliFs1ruVZH6h/PqqNOoPOgjwxMCkKdX0WfqcBEqRaBHK iMRM9yn2M01QvlyA47qAlldZyF1NJhgimKlcEgugbWy1168kUG+SCc7tPNTxy/M3Aj1w jT/w== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [23.128.96.18]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id d14si9899210eje.95.2020.07.04.16.51.49; Sat, 04 Jul 2020 16:52:14 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1728044AbgGDXve (ORCPT + 99 others); Sat, 4 Jul 2020 19:51:34 -0400 Received: from foss.arm.com ([217.140.110.172]:40214 "EHLO foss.arm.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1728004AbgGDXve (ORCPT ); Sat, 4 Jul 2020 19:51:34 -0400 Received: from usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (unknown [10.121.207.14]) by usa-sjc-mx-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C466330E; Sat, 4 Jul 2020 16:51:33 -0700 (PDT) Received: from e113632-lin (e113632-lin.cambridge.arm.com [10.1.194.46]) by usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id DB1043F73C; Sat, 4 Jul 2020 16:51:32 -0700 (PDT) References: <20200703155645.29703-1-valentin.schneider@arm.com> <6d902159f1819b6f3a0af5e982d11868@kernel.org> User-agent: mu4e 0.9.17; emacs 26.3 From: Valentin Schneider To: Marc Zyngier Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, sparclinux@vger.kernel.org, "David S. Miller" , Thomas Gleixner , Jason Cooper Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] genirq: Kill preflow handlers In-reply-to: <6d902159f1819b6f3a0af5e982d11868@kernel.org> Date: Sun, 05 Jul 2020 00:51:26 +0100 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi Marc, On 04/07/20 10:48, Marc Zyngier wrote: > Hi Valentin, > > On 2020-07-03 16:56, Valentin Schneider wrote: >> Hi, >> >> while strolling around the different flow handlers, I tried to make >> sense of >> what preflow_handler() was about. Turns out no one uses those anymore, >> but the >> genirq support has remained in place. > > If we needed to reintroduce some form of preflow handler, we'd try and > do it using hierarchical irqchips, if at all possible. Right, that does sound like the most sensible approach. If I got my history right, the preflow handlers saw the light of day before hierarchical domains did, which I suppose is a reason why it wasn't done that way back then. > >> >> Unless we can see another user of those in the near future, this seems >> like as >> good a time as any for a little housecleaning. >> >> - Patch 1 simply deselects the (unexploited) preflow Kconfig for >> sparc64 >> - Patch 2 is the actual cleanup >> >> Cheers, >> Valentin >> >> Valentin Schneider (2): >> sparc64: Deselect IRQ_PREFLOW_FASTEOI >> genirq: Remove preflow handler support >> >> arch/sparc/Kconfig | 1 - >> include/linux/irqdesc.h | 15 --------------- >> include/linux/irqhandler.h | 1 - >> kernel/irq/Kconfig | 4 ---- >> kernel/irq/chip.c | 13 ------------- >> 5 files changed, 34 deletions(-) > > For the whole series, and assuming that there is no regression > (can't imagine any for unused code): > > Reviewed-by: Marc Zyngier > Thanks! > Thanks, > > M.