Received: by 2002:a05:6902:102b:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id x11csp9685ybt; Mon, 6 Jul 2020 02:44:37 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJxbkCMn8BdbQeF8IjEr8VSH4KfBooEREj16HtFr3WH6/ayv3QerLV58aJhvcX7fgofIf9k5 X-Received: by 2002:a17:906:8588:: with SMTP id v8mr44305873ejx.211.1594028676937; Mon, 06 Jul 2020 02:44:36 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1594028676; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=EWewad+HZzzaUFLy3ZbtQbzjiKuvYC2CKXkFQUS77gH1QvRICHGGjqyPpVOBoNzw9Y I0KAjXfLUSsoQie35UzhYpn0Gsrd0BydIIZJPGVbZjN83Bod9g2jrbMORtkTj3VlEm6W DM92Q+wQn0Owo0+H9+bGxUV1m1bxLW8q7W/KF/vYRFwpnJAN+AWjoXcwNR38heFnkQpZ WJRB3/qJBqeq9jcHKITFrgVEAY/7DeoOIP/hWNWq8VRT8ry5yEdsWO9hW49Wmn79pZZG hzRqhdeLR+7vmF3609fekUe8AMtAgNrI9Swxrfu3EbupBqumRPbUJAzMJ9zMXw+ZvdlU Wxsw== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:message-id:date:subject:cc:to:from; bh=e8MF6sqcYaeDpwFnR+7FEGddQ8Ncs37oIe9mOH81k0c=; b=MW0J4+hMrIRy7wGTIN8cq1fxPTROAeR4XSXGSh4/yJ1lpW9O6OsJVowt33sOtwJcXf wXkoorIlCHU1f2r/wbkmQyIZZRUsTCNaKa3IImFjwkiYd5h3DtX0eL+jWEJLcIyZp+k4 3D/DUabt/KPjirbNnU3o64c//DW742i4F3Hh1MnXAAN+7kNdGWGaEZ4GIWMZX+Wsww0C g2zKdPqvAciCOBzlnaWF7oxPAvY8r9+8exWJsPLrsJubEqJJUVJXaOSEi0pywCEOeWUH 3hR5OA7I3p19z2+T5SHixeDXzop/mfulDOcqQd7urrUyOYMQmpvbwpUXeRaHKPN6pEjI DHSA== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=ibm.com Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [23.128.96.18]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id x4si12507497edq.506.2020.07.06.02.44.14; Mon, 06 Jul 2020 02:44:36 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=ibm.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1728489AbgGFJnI (ORCPT + 99 others); Mon, 6 Jul 2020 05:43:08 -0400 Received: from mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com ([148.163.156.1]:46778 "EHLO mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1728024AbgGFJnH (ORCPT ); Mon, 6 Jul 2020 05:43:07 -0400 Received: from pps.filterd (m0098404.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com (8.16.0.42/8.16.0.42) with SMTP id 0669gPlr151336; Mon, 6 Jul 2020 05:43:07 -0400 Received: from ppma06fra.de.ibm.com (48.49.7a9f.ip4.static.sl-reverse.com [159.122.73.72]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com with ESMTP id 322numv13p-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Mon, 06 Jul 2020 05:43:07 -0400 Received: from pps.filterd (ppma06fra.de.ibm.com [127.0.0.1]) by ppma06fra.de.ibm.com (8.16.0.42/8.16.0.42) with SMTP id 0669gBU6014660; Mon, 6 Jul 2020 09:43:05 GMT Received: from b06cxnps3074.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (d06relay09.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com [9.149.109.194]) by ppma06fra.de.ibm.com with ESMTP id 322h1g92du-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Mon, 06 Jul 2020 09:43:04 +0000 Received: from d06av21.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (d06av21.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com [9.149.105.232]) by b06cxnps3074.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (8.14.9/8.14.9/NCO v10.0) with ESMTP id 0669h20931522988 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=OK); Mon, 6 Jul 2020 09:43:02 GMT Received: from d06av21.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id 02C945204E; Mon, 6 Jul 2020 09:43:02 +0000 (GMT) Received: from oc3871087118.ibm.com (unknown [9.145.151.4]) by d06av21.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9D87952050; Mon, 6 Jul 2020 09:43:01 +0000 (GMT) From: Alexander Gordeev To: linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Alexander Gordeev Subject: [PATCH 0/3] perf bench numa: fix few minor issues Date: Mon, 6 Jul 2020 11:42:51 +0200 Message-Id: X-Mailer: git-send-email 1.8.3.1 X-TM-AS-GCONF: 00 X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10434:6.0.235,18.0.687 definitions=2020-07-06_07:2020-07-06,2020-07-06 signatures=0 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=outbound_notspam policy=outbound score=0 mlxscore=0 cotscore=-2147483648 lowpriorityscore=0 clxscore=1011 suspectscore=1 priorityscore=1501 impostorscore=0 mlxlogscore=999 bulkscore=0 malwarescore=0 phishscore=0 adultscore=0 spamscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.12.0-2004280000 definitions=main-2007060072 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi all, Please, find couple of fixes to the tool. Note, I did not bother fixing leaked memory allocated with numa_allocate_cpumask(). Alexander Gordeev (3): perf bench numa: fix incorrect NUMA toplogy assumption perf bench numa: fix benchmark names perf bench numa: fix wrong benchmark configuration tools/perf/bench/numa.c | 72 ++++++++++++++++++++++++------------------------- 1 file changed, 35 insertions(+), 37 deletions(-) -- 1.8.3.1