Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18;
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <20200702175352.19223-1-TheSven73@gmail.com> <20200702175352.19223-3-TheSven73@gmail.com>
 <CAOMZO5DxUeXH8ZYxmKynA7xO3uF6SP_Kt-g=8MPgsF7tqkRvAA@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAGngYiXGXDqCZeJme026uz5FjU56UojmQFFiJ5_CZ_AywdQiEw@mail.gmail.com>
 <AM6PR0402MB360781DA3F738C2DF445E821FF680@AM6PR0402MB3607.eurprd04.prod.outlook.com>
 <CAGngYiWc8rNVEPC-8GK1yH4zXx7tgR9gseYaopu9GWDnSG1oyg@mail.gmail.com>
 <AM6PR0402MB36073F63D2DE2646B4F71081FF690@AM6PR0402MB3607.eurprd04.prod.outlook.com>
 <CAOMZO5ATv9o197pH4O-7DV-ftsP7gGVuF1+r-sGd2j44x+n-Ug@mail.gmail.com> <CAGngYiVeNQits4CXiXmN2ZBWyoN32zqUYtaxKCqwtKztm-Ky8A@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAGngYiVeNQits4CXiXmN2ZBWyoN32zqUYtaxKCqwtKztm-Ky8A@mail.gmail.com>
From:   Sven Van Asbroeck <thesven73@gmail.com>
Date:   Mon, 6 Jul 2020 10:59:34 -0400
Message-ID: <CAGngYiX9Hx413BX-rgaaUjD9umS9hGg=gMLbM+QmdyEt2Nut5A@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [EXT] Re: [PATCH v5 3/3] ARM: imx6plus: optionally enable
 internal routing of clk_enet_ref
To:     Fabio Estevam <festevam@gmail.com>
Cc:     Andy Duan <fugang.duan@nxp.com>, Shawn Guo <shawnguo@kernel.org>,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>,
        "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
        Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>,
        netdev <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
        "open list:OPEN FIRMWARE AND FLATTENED DEVICE TREE BINDINGS" 
        <devicetree@vger.kernel.org>,
        Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@pengutronix.de>,
        Pengutronix Kernel Team <kernel@pengutronix.de>,
        dl-linux-imx <linux-imx@nxp.com>,
        "moderated list:ARM/FREESCALE IMX / MXC ARM ARCHITECTURE" 
        <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
        linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

On Mon, Jul 6, 2020 at 10:58 AM Sven Van Asbroeck <thesven73@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Hi Fabio,
>
> On Mon, Jul 6, 2020 at 9:46 AM Fabio Estevam <festevam@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > Would it make sense to use compatible = "mmio-mux"; like we do on
> > imx7s, imx6qdl.dtsi and imx8mq.dtsi?
>
> Maybe "fixed-mmio-clock" is a better candidate ?

Actually no, the mmio memory there only controls the frequency...

I don't think the clock framework has a ready-made abstraction
suitable for a GPR clock mux yet?