Received: by 2002:a05:6902:102b:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id x11csp464966ybt; Mon, 6 Jul 2020 13:51:12 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJxs55j4tmn3UX/JAYjz4E12hWp7GTB7CisZ0Ck8+6XXSTfYm2cHfR+4LhFOb5JmrJYKrbM8 X-Received: by 2002:a05:6402:a58:: with SMTP id bt24mr59451576edb.333.1594068672385; Mon, 06 Jul 2020 13:51:12 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1594068672; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=i+RW3nDDZiKmTNMFoFlw8J0cFghrYk5sKEdVdzn3G+hCNXFfFZ4O2kZmgC83db6KeS xqWDT9MB5LyyYuHgTArgP1VEAqv/Fmj8DOAOd2lsXgZlambZYu92iwA0VjBS5jzzfX27 B/1rfUopDNb5PpAajyqvWFLZxZu03tl3uX/KqNiIbOumD4CW7TpXFjY1ISjb8k/csHRf D64KgdA16PM0aXzY4uuMQMM8WQ4YZXbjU0cCY4oEtnRpgagu+AAXwYXlNvBz2qYJtTzr +oJxRfJmPxhInPpWWt/yskx8z8fb5hXBImWY7H2NcjY3SGtAAhf+YxpCfZtJ5RFv7/le iLKg== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:message-id:date:subject:cc:to:from :dkim-signature:dkim-filter; bh=XlqRnfsoWKc5MVLCjC5AxpBd+CFQtEQAvuC1zE63+Y0=; b=aCfE9kR1AOthZq1XKUq/cF15RW/Xw94M8K4XeLbmDyCoI1KrQsU/0xrgu5+Q6m0dbo FTznPm0t1+qsG58tjsk4EvasKHn6fRsi5/AaE55GU1AFc4b5rEkw1R7C20dX3ftkX2rQ gE5pShL/sCPhpbD4KJxcpYZWJ6lF6GCBlVNpaB7k3uxms7MXdgFGEUaoePGuP+oym1QT UIkDDt4brzxxw+hyhvJRn39N8dMied7AZGACFdLfaxvL3aBWyIVOiXAvu2/fOBNrVOJR faeKeYUp7RHTPxWd6iu7Tayi0KWf25CvweVBNhKI2yYPx1TOuFjB4v8XTXnsleFyNcFy AD/Q== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@efficios.com header.s=default header.b=kYIFEzQe; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=efficios.com Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [23.128.96.18]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id v20si14197204ejj.365.2020.07.06.13.50.49; Mon, 06 Jul 2020 13:51:12 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@efficios.com header.s=default header.b=kYIFEzQe; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=efficios.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726684AbgGFUtm (ORCPT + 99 others); Mon, 6 Jul 2020 16:49:42 -0400 Received: from mail.efficios.com ([167.114.26.124]:56924 "EHLO mail.efficios.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1725860AbgGFUtm (ORCPT ); Mon, 6 Jul 2020 16:49:42 -0400 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.efficios.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 926692DCDA5; Mon, 6 Jul 2020 16:49:41 -0400 (EDT) Received: from mail.efficios.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mail03.efficios.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10032) with ESMTP id zgXfZ8ULZHuK; Mon, 6 Jul 2020 16:49:41 -0400 (EDT) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.efficios.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2780F2DCE1F; Mon, 6 Jul 2020 16:49:41 -0400 (EDT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.10.3 mail.efficios.com 2780F2DCE1F DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=efficios.com; s=default; t=1594068581; bh=XlqRnfsoWKc5MVLCjC5AxpBd+CFQtEQAvuC1zE63+Y0=; h=From:To:Date:Message-Id; b=kYIFEzQeOrM7uwndSuipxq1i/t1+T8X4j91h/fDUIb/fqSqnT31p+CpQ3crCqc5iw B3X3jvDFQjenxqoTmKUiCZ/XtNaZyEutEyla1JpI2DaD3oe4vDj2EOUimK3ypjg2r6 sgz4/DCtz9YHhweZaiprXuqe7OwlzbJBLqu8q6hCz2loIwsxJlvQEkteiG6AcnwWfW r9wqv00CWTEo8RDX7G1ynaFN5dWmc2WND8hvuVXfdF+SyXd8bing4Ilhk4MZUWxmzD wDyppX9nX214yeF4WgxT5dupBKCZDO6j+Th5hIfeGX2M1yy3nZKFqEoCZLOPd2AuNk XblzTfeWga1cQ== X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at efficios.com Received: from mail.efficios.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mail03.efficios.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10026) with ESMTP id 1T7FcRgLYua3; Mon, 6 Jul 2020 16:49:41 -0400 (EDT) Received: from localhost.localdomain (192-222-181-218.qc.cable.ebox.net [192.222.181.218]) by mail.efficios.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id A243A2DCDA3; Mon, 6 Jul 2020 16:49:40 -0400 (EDT) From: Mathieu Desnoyers To: Thomas Gleixner Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Peter Zijlstra , "Paul E . McKenney" , Boqun Feng , "H . Peter Anvin" , Paul Turner , linux-api@vger.kernel.org, Florian Weimer , Mathieu Desnoyers Subject: [RFC PATCH for 5.8 0/4] rseq cpu_id ABI fix Date: Mon, 6 Jul 2020 16:49:09 -0400 Message-Id: <20200706204913.20347-1-mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.17.1 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi, Recent integration of rseq into glibc unearthed an issue with inaccurate cpu_id field for newly created tasks. This series includes a fix for the underlying issue (meant to be backported to stable), as well as new rseq flags to let user-space know that the kernel implements this fix, so glibc and other rseq users can use this flag to know whether they can safely use rseq without risk of corrupting their per-cpu data. This new flag could either be added only to the master branch (no stable backport) or backported to stable, depending on what seems the most appropriate. This is an RFC aiming for quick inclusion into the Linux kernel, unless we prefer reverting the entire rseq glibc integration and try again in 6 months. Their upcoming release is on August 3rd, so we need to take a decision on this matter quickly. Thanks, Mathieu Mathieu Desnoyers (4): sched: Fix unreliable rseq cpu_id for new tasks rseq: Introduce RSEQ_FLAG_REGISTER rseq: Introduce RSEQ_FLAG_RELIABLE_CPU_ID rseq: selftests: Expect reliable cpu_id field include/uapi/linux/rseq.h | 15 +++++- kernel/rseq.c | 81 ++++++++++++++++------------- kernel/sched/core.c | 2 + tools/testing/selftests/rseq/rseq.c | 10 +++- 4 files changed, 71 insertions(+), 37 deletions(-) -- 2.17.1