Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932432AbWDAApL (ORCPT ); Fri, 31 Mar 2006 19:45:11 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S932433AbWDAApL (ORCPT ); Fri, 31 Mar 2006 19:45:11 -0500 Received: from omta05ps.mx.bigpond.com ([144.140.83.195]:5034 "EHLO omta05ps.mx.bigpond.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932432AbWDAApJ (ORCPT ); Fri, 31 Mar 2006 19:45:09 -0500 Message-ID: <442DCD13.1020804@bigpond.net.au> Date: Sat, 01 Apr 2006 11:45:07 +1100 From: Peter Williams User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5 (X11/20060313) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Con Kolivas CC: ck@vds.kolivas.org, Thorsten Will , linux list Subject: Re: Staircase test patch References: <200603312307.58507.kernel@kolivas.org> <200604010917.09413.kernel@kolivas.org> <442DC7DB.10406@bigpond.net.au> <200604011031.41849.kernel@kolivas.org> In-Reply-To: <200604011031.41849.kernel@kolivas.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Authentication-Info: Submitted using SMTP AUTH PLAIN at omta05ps.mx.bigpond.com from [147.10.133.38] using ID pwil3058@bigpond.net.au at Sat, 1 Apr 2006 00:45:07 +0000 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1925 Lines: 47 Con Kolivas wrote: > On Saturday 01 April 2006 10:22, Peter Williams wrote: >> Con Kolivas wrote: >>> On Saturday 01 April 2006 07:31, Thorsten Will wrote: >>>> On Friday 31 March 2006 23:07 +1000, Con Kolivas wrote: >>>>> Hi Thorsten et al >>>> Hi, Con. >>>> >>>>> Thorsten could you please test to see if this fixes the problem for >>>>> you? >>>> Oh boy, oh boy, oh boy. >>>> >>>> Against a bash loop: >>>> |# dd bs=1M count=2048 /dev/null >>>> |2048+0 records in >>>> |2048+0 records out >>>> |2147483648 bytes transferred in 35.497603 seconds (60496582 bytes/sec) >>>> >>>> Yes! Success! And the crowd goes wild! :-) >>>> >>>> I think you finally nailed it. Thank you so much! >>> No, thank _you_ for bringing it to my attention and testing :) >> Should I apply this to staircase in PlugSched? > > I plan to make staircase v15 which is just this change, which would then need > to be resunc with plugsched. Unfortunately this needs code in > account_system_time which is not open to the schedulers in plugsched > currently so it needs more plugsched code to go in. I suspect other > schedulers may want to hook into this function, but I know you're currently > busy with smp nice to hack this in. I may look at doing it myself when I have > time if you don't have time. OK. I'm currently porting PlugSched to 2.6.16-mm2 which requires adding priority inheritance to each scheduler. I'm modifying staircase and nicksched myself but would appreciate a code review after I release it. Peter -- Peter Williams pwil3058@bigpond.net.au "Learning, n. The kind of ignorance distinguishing the studious." -- Ambrose Bierce - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/