Received: by 2002:a05:6902:102b:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id x11csp570103ybt; Mon, 6 Jul 2020 16:56:36 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJxeB2txYFPxExsauA4rNlDTKIOPnvWDyXRqmjwGWE6xUBi2TSuGGl43jHdLNs/Cp00aJKgM X-Received: by 2002:a17:906:edb3:: with SMTP id sa19mr44410863ejb.21.1594079796654; Mon, 06 Jul 2020 16:56:36 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1594079796; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=h6Soc3FDc+8B1iGphxvQipUeQAWUVIpYxYB7fPpl2vm/Yd68NSvSrjsCGL4NgIdhip nG+4U32UAteqE4MKpyRgCqp4Qn2IEr7jJ9jWNoQYifkpBKujRITYF51bBlAfvWsR5K1H ywo0hFiULsgNlYpSY5oDnU15gnqrD6LXJSZdq8xO9ZBnhtla8eUInSzee890kOhnFonH qhfVhj1Wt8H4JB76jUdx3IjijyfAmbMWFyna825aHfljbWku9oqd+RREADO+12yJMBhP YI7wqnlGZquf0EhrMSVLprM/pwqLpLY52u/FCLd+ckzzmKxKkNTP4pCKmj7mhJ9d+dQe W2wg== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:content-language :content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to:mime-version:user-agent:date :message-id:from:references:cc:to:subject; bh=opmuM+CsxwqGtqzJCSOMSRAIrOsB/4xJSBwgw+R4Gyo=; b=c0bGRTfoZG3MX+V31y/eFKWy9oTF7KasB3wnAD28mj4mEbg1W491RizRkHvr6HOo4+ FRG30J9/5dvt0qwYkxJmOFmfG1Or2z6zloOQGuFeRxxxe0HoUqvKK3Ov6UfO3v0VsvaD GVcekGwAbGzI9m8uqT5tGwAtjrs8cslnv5kLjEYo7qz1FjcB9et9nBjIvyYLjyYsmwh5 KzM7AWuv7ZJlwzR0AbBcjW7YUPliomz6nY/e/kNTipWIbUnWvxqbhxHx139UIkMb3uih uK/ifhaFmAJd3aXLjYNTP1qerh+GQne5gy5c5+fb/8W6M163SLTrutpBaqCic2XxpaJc fLPQ== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=ibm.com Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [23.128.96.18]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id dn17si18117403ejc.556.2020.07.06.16.55.52; Mon, 06 Jul 2020 16:56:36 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=ibm.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1727058AbgGFXz3 (ORCPT + 99 others); Mon, 6 Jul 2020 19:55:29 -0400 Received: from mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com ([148.163.156.1]:10104 "EHLO mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726729AbgGFXz3 (ORCPT ); Mon, 6 Jul 2020 19:55:29 -0400 Received: from pps.filterd (m0098393.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com (8.16.0.42/8.16.0.42) with SMTP id 066NWgxB047932; Mon, 6 Jul 2020 19:55:28 -0400 Received: from ppma01wdc.us.ibm.com (fd.55.37a9.ip4.static.sl-reverse.com [169.55.85.253]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com with ESMTP id 3249rbxdfn-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Mon, 06 Jul 2020 19:55:28 -0400 Received: from pps.filterd (ppma01wdc.us.ibm.com [127.0.0.1]) by ppma01wdc.us.ibm.com (8.16.0.42/8.16.0.42) with SMTP id 066NsRnQ002711; Mon, 6 Jul 2020 23:55:27 GMT Received: from b01cxnp22035.gho.pok.ibm.com (b01cxnp22035.gho.pok.ibm.com [9.57.198.25]) by ppma01wdc.us.ibm.com with ESMTP id 322hd8bdmx-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Mon, 06 Jul 2020 23:55:27 +0000 Received: from b01ledav006.gho.pok.ibm.com (b01ledav006.gho.pok.ibm.com [9.57.199.111]) by b01cxnp22035.gho.pok.ibm.com (8.14.9/8.14.9/NCO v10.0) with ESMTP id 066NtQCU38011226 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=OK); Mon, 6 Jul 2020 23:55:26 GMT Received: from b01ledav006.gho.pok.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id CACC2AC05E; Mon, 6 Jul 2020 23:55:26 +0000 (GMT) Received: from b01ledav006.gho.pok.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9505CAC05F; Mon, 6 Jul 2020 23:55:26 +0000 (GMT) Received: from sbct-3.pok.ibm.com (unknown [9.47.158.153]) by b01ledav006.gho.pok.ibm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP; Mon, 6 Jul 2020 23:55:26 +0000 (GMT) Subject: Re: [PATCH v9 2/2] tpm: Add support for event log pointer found in TPM2 ACPI table To: Jarkko Sakkinen , Stefan Berger Cc: linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org, linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org References: <20200706181953.3592084-1-stefanb@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <20200706181953.3592084-3-stefanb@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <20200706230914.GC20770@linux.intel.com> From: Stefan Berger Message-ID: <78ec872f-89b3-6464-6ede-bd0a46fe5c4c@linux.ibm.com> Date: Mon, 6 Jul 2020 19:55:26 -0400 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.4.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20200706230914.GC20770@linux.intel.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Language: en-US X-TM-AS-GCONF: 00 X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10434:6.0.235,18.0.687 definitions=2020-07-06_20:2020-07-06,2020-07-06 signatures=0 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=outbound_notspam policy=outbound score=0 bulkscore=0 priorityscore=1501 spamscore=0 impostorscore=0 lowpriorityscore=0 cotscore=-2147483648 clxscore=1015 phishscore=0 suspectscore=0 adultscore=0 mlxlogscore=999 mlxscore=0 malwarescore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.12.0-2004280000 definitions=main-2007060163 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 7/6/20 7:09 PM, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote: > On Mon, Jul 06, 2020 at 02:19:53PM -0400, Stefan Berger wrote: >> From: Stefan Berger >> >> In case a TPM2 is attached, search for a TPM2 ACPI table when trying >> to get the event log from ACPI. If one is found, use it to get the >> start and length of the log area. This allows non-UEFI systems, such >> as SeaBIOS, to pass an event log when using a TPM2. >> >> Signed-off-by: Stefan Berger > Do you think that QEMU with TPM 1.2 emulator turned on would be a viable > way to test this? Yes. > > I'm anyway more worried about breaking existing TPM 1.2 functionality > and that requires only QEMU without extras. > > /Jarkko