Received: by 2002:a05:6902:102b:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id x11csp570991ybt; Mon, 6 Jul 2020 16:58:37 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJy6Gw5W1a1rc1PHoR2WJy2a/mH4XD1a9ixfkUYhdKq/TamCggeqtdaXEyjSi2Hpv+/Xwbsq X-Received: by 2002:a17:906:a156:: with SMTP id bu22mr44091819ejb.322.1594079917440; Mon, 06 Jul 2020 16:58:37 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1594079917; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=ezf+k0tnBPbJCqzutl1CThZdFvXm1UergCwVkPWLV0vlgEqzNNr/vvPeORLO6lCpKA bLR7Rny19cjodGsL9YZ3YcVsfW0hXRGcUM2WL9sdeIp+nsOk1DmehqFrqayUbaetUoi9 YAU67CMh9a/fgbt2ZzKcCN/aFKv7k469/qsIXIumpfTSlpD//L6xlAE7jgYFvZzxrVLz XgA1vCIEHYS7h5fvMgDnyxo5AY3qVkIlMzyORPfWrTiOi1mzd27YE/a3Or62KGOmNeSV 0L6H4Wvt+gpUqVkAsWl7uD20RQJiyv4wsQUoXWF4RF4WHxbfEtD3vERTRTUag+1hqKhi 6X/w== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:mime-version:message-id:date:in-reply-to :subject:cc:to:from:user-agent:references:dkim-signature; bh=5h/pRXHkSxEq61rxonlUns+UKJmDH2+YzkyLNI3P18c=; b=iLHmHROShD4CRLdQmGCZ6J9Zlf5b6X1vgNzZOgmfeKMWUvm8NZXuXUav6BfkC1uWnE GsY+HKGul0k1IIP09DZjfdV0nImmRDgd6H28jZ0Fv4kBruylmmN5Hx78awZo4uaxJElR 2QOpwi+LM07Urrc+dCBOqG3sv5+MJdCSR0V+dhUizCaMC35aA8D3bcoRwGOYIM36tONf iQ08al4jE4YopzBhEELh2tWx4iuX42XM/xhCHf+pLuSIPW7/CLzOmlsXqLxINy+YaElF mIYccNvXEqMK9W0bG50OG9GDIFJp6HrqE9CkoUwtaDKA35lE+hpKg7CocVk6GV7GRdeH ekiw== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@redhat.com header.s=mimecast20190719 header.b=aGp6EKPx; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=redhat.com Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [23.128.96.18]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id c25si13936805edv.335.2020.07.06.16.58.13; Mon, 06 Jul 2020 16:58:37 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@redhat.com header.s=mimecast20190719 header.b=aGp6EKPx; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=redhat.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1727110AbgGFX5g (ORCPT + 99 others); Mon, 6 Jul 2020 19:57:36 -0400 Received: from us-smtp-delivery-1.mimecast.com ([207.211.31.120]:55695 "EHLO us-smtp-1.mimecast.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726805AbgGFX5g (ORCPT ); Mon, 6 Jul 2020 19:57:36 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1594079855; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=5h/pRXHkSxEq61rxonlUns+UKJmDH2+YzkyLNI3P18c=; b=aGp6EKPxAstW77DGe6ZmYhe2ZUC+5XcHTSyk+HH/uE0a0Ypcp0jVA+lScCxSuzRyxd0tdQ Tt0YW5cM3xkT9VWy+9eKjgS1fFqQ4gXVhDP2r+oc0+VHsR8yq5TGvhMChuuvFCk8rlAMp0 hiGQJdrnnUkHhv8LXJzgRAChPb1fTZ4= Received: from mail-qv1-f70.google.com (mail-qv1-f70.google.com [209.85.219.70]) (Using TLS) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP id us-mta-419-pTZlIE4oNFSUsG264xJT0w-1; Mon, 06 Jul 2020 19:57:31 -0400 X-MC-Unique: pTZlIE4oNFSUsG264xJT0w-1 Received: by mail-qv1-f70.google.com with SMTP id cv20so14988536qvb.12 for ; Mon, 06 Jul 2020 16:57:31 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:references:user-agent:from:to:cc:subject :in-reply-to:date:message-id:mime-version; bh=5h/pRXHkSxEq61rxonlUns+UKJmDH2+YzkyLNI3P18c=; b=n6KcE4iMIfQFrdctiAsmpVE4sEG7lhMyQEPCFzYchdYkTqspUDQaAKEPhMbALf29WU NG/KQKFAf1ndalMSp6Kil3QknDIXcfX7X5D88B5ugBJVWzQkVGINpS5Eqr+lWKFqpZby hzi5lLILfLeUCQY5HfJnwSrOlkHyDw3p5GodoDH/XeOewQmYTpSLjOJwU6XqDttnIFWD fnj8UrdAzBcsFJGzDBOcOL5jRFD0+ylCpB+QmaXKRRgaxbYZskVFNF9/HeUfCY1KciZM UX3YUrWQnWa5m+Tx7V67dSgveZxKavXKY2Z3H2hm6x7Mj6zVHQtf/LeBDVuQZFj8fn5b KddA== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM533Gck7kSYHBLqk1Yta4IkggMQI0Ih0qfMAP0uTkXQMG5qZof304 LK9c4Ti/AQhS57SuQyhyIK4rgLlkRt5EhOyoFRh7hr+uMWnbsRj6o5TIiJ6vuGdedpcywS7vvsW 96QrB2byXfT7aMk5i4sPw4U6E X-Received: by 2002:a37:a253:: with SMTP id l80mr49623332qke.197.1594079851023; Mon, 06 Jul 2020 16:57:31 -0700 (PDT) X-Received: by 2002:a37:a253:: with SMTP id l80mr49623312qke.197.1594079850724; Mon, 06 Jul 2020 16:57:30 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (ip70-163-223-149.ph.ph.cox.net. [70.163.223.149]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id g41sm25799385qtb.37.2020.07.06.16.57.29 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Mon, 06 Jul 2020 16:57:30 -0700 (PDT) References: <20200706181953.3592084-1-stefanb@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <20200706181953.3592084-3-stefanb@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <20200706230914.GC20770@linux.intel.com> User-agent: mu4e 1.4.10; emacs 26.3 From: Jerry Snitselaar To: Jarkko Sakkinen Cc: Stefan Berger , linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org, linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org, Stefan Berger Subject: Re: [PATCH v9 2/2] tpm: Add support for event log pointer found in TPM2 ACPI table In-reply-to: <20200706230914.GC20770@linux.intel.com> Date: Mon, 06 Jul 2020 16:57:28 -0700 Message-ID: <87mu4cjixj.fsf@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Jarkko Sakkinen @ 2020-07-06 16:09 MST: > On Mon, Jul 06, 2020 at 02:19:53PM -0400, Stefan Berger wrote: >> From: Stefan Berger >> >> In case a TPM2 is attached, search for a TPM2 ACPI table when trying >> to get the event log from ACPI. If one is found, use it to get the >> start and length of the log area. This allows non-UEFI systems, such >> as SeaBIOS, to pass an event log when using a TPM2. >> >> Signed-off-by: Stefan Berger > > Do you think that QEMU with TPM 1.2 emulator turned on would be a viable > way to test this? > > I'm anyway more worried about breaking existing TPM 1.2 functionality > and that requires only QEMU without extras. > > /Jarkko The 1.2 bits should be functionally the same as before, right?