Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18;
Date:   Tue, 7 Jul 2020 10:36:45 +0100
From:   Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
To:     Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
Cc:     Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
        ksummit <ksummit-discuss@lists.linuxfoundation.org>,
        Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        tech-board-discuss@lists.linuxfoundation.org,
        Chris Mason <clm@fb.clm>
Subject: Re: [Tech-board-discuss] [PATCH] CodingStyle: Inclusive Terminology
Message-ID: <20200707093645.GA4870@sirena.org.uk>
References: <159389297140.2210796.13590142254668787525.stgit@dwillia2-desk3.amr.corp.intel.com>
 <20200706191555.GD6176@sirena.org.uk>
 <CAPcyv4iiVvJHPTmgssTvp=jsFCs2r068mPtZ9s0qXfEKFNdVBw@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512;
        protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="2oS5YaxWCcQjTEyO"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <CAPcyv4iiVvJHPTmgssTvp=jsFCs2r068mPtZ9s0qXfEKFNdVBw@mail.gmail.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13)
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk


--2oS5YaxWCcQjTEyO
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline

On Mon, Jul 06, 2020 at 09:08:57PM -0700, Dan Williams wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 6, 2020 at 12:16 PM Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org> wrote:

> > This, especially the bit about "revelation of 2020", sounds a little
> > off to me - I think it's that it's worryingly close to the frequently
> > derided pattern where people recognise a problem that other people have
> > been talking about for a while and treat it as something new.  Perhaps a
> > more neutrally worded reference to current events and/or our desire to
> > improve instead?

> I'd just as soon let this commentary live in the archives if people
> need some more background. It's not like we have companion essays on
> the other recommendations in coding-style, and we seem to be
> converging on just amending coding-style.

That's even better from my point of view.

--2oS5YaxWCcQjTEyO
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----

iQEzBAABCgAdFiEEreZoqmdXGLWf4p/qJNaLcl1Uh9AFAl8EQioACgkQJNaLcl1U
h9DXsAf+Ixl3NaYK0JFA8SARde57YtdMm0jI29+4yhgy2x5Mz7JNSIcLoBqODnUv
GxDzz4Xy5u5YSDT0Okvxp50pMurC0ALBt+d6TAw7oCwpTw/46JkCGJBCaFd0w6aB
LtWa9zqMK6ZTNUZLl65hnksBJmrR9OrIzbqkFuO42S+1nzgscno/mOK8qzTdqMJl
7vPkg/1yy7F59jCvBawdXJgxEcd6GAQlB/SRq0pDOgh4pMoOUz0dQtS517id72Dp
996WK3ZSWZ4wrQR+UXkiHTQdXWETPF/ZTB8JjGA87QabYxB9FUaox/SUpqKAlvl2
pa6mhDPrq7D9I7A8wpN+B4DOD9s6jg==
=PT9R
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--2oS5YaxWCcQjTEyO--