Received: by 2002:a05:6902:102b:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id x11csp931228ybt; Tue, 7 Jul 2020 03:51:44 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJxvMnPnYoyF/KtNsTrv2IRAe/Xd7IoYtdWNzSVSNA5F0zm5udFj5cZRGRGKcVXyo3dBDgBb X-Received: by 2002:a17:906:fa9b:: with SMTP id lt27mr44667301ejb.365.1594119104268; Tue, 07 Jul 2020 03:51:44 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1594119104; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=ust8aUshH2i8zsOJm4hfzUPoo2Mr4lKOlOe1O7nsmjVURFczeHDWtN6+kExiiPZ5J5 ooc8Vs2/KiEdly6fOztP787cViOgx1H5JhSkYK5eDa6p6OH2HjHyaIT18bjXWjvLz/Dq pJAwlQIGlffxp16/Y8iOdBBh7XwKf2bkA8wh/j7YiTdSk5RUFz1x+ojN82I2Bjp0nwki mMa5OSPeaHkwa6Lxxmun1vz0GAW7mkf/OaJtIJfLrbreKnjrANGVxd8eKUlGr/cFUi2g MqRSbkDIWKDBPsvKg9nR4j6n0o8LzC4xTZ2nt13nV6FfR3RtCFtyeqsvPNpR+16MRExL qx9w== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version :references:in-reply-to:message-id:cc:to:subject:from:date :dkim-signature; bh=ZmDFVd32HVWpn2fLFFX5aBkZfhcHoubKvi/z02gqnBE=; b=VtMIwqSE33RshCHpnzuW+lVzAUywNKtGxU0tld+3Qv+ueHv3qwJ4+V01Gk4zxyUjha NUTKSJLwHuQbMp9yoya29RYThpzUznryLL9YfmMjCg8qRJXppCVxHIBs8607TfwGiukL jzXpraTJ+MGArMGTK9+jOybZKluGchrQSTWejsvSodG08Rm56T0y071RWSc2ntpzw/p7 2O0IN4qoc7hZHDJV/eABoehkYaNt45t8gOHGOewBP1jnLr6WGh5mpCJKJVVq46wF4s7V qe5DqIM4/CUkDvRciTgAdDzXN5w717sqNwNMJ/GrSk3k3S7rrBtwGHvivwk+AfzBaGcC EDhA== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=fail header.i=@crapouillou.net header.s=mail header.b="YPAO/bHb"; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=crapouillou.net Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [23.128.96.18]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id ds17si18591979ejc.619.2020.07.07.03.51.20; Tue, 07 Jul 2020 03:51:44 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=fail header.i=@crapouillou.net header.s=mail header.b="YPAO/bHb"; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=crapouillou.net Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1728150AbgGGKtk (ORCPT + 99 others); Tue, 7 Jul 2020 06:49:40 -0400 Received: from crapouillou.net ([89.234.176.41]:55324 "EHLO crapouillou.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1727090AbgGGKtk (ORCPT ); Tue, 7 Jul 2020 06:49:40 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=crapouillou.net; s=mail; t=1594118977; h=from:from:sender:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date: message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version: content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=ZmDFVd32HVWpn2fLFFX5aBkZfhcHoubKvi/z02gqnBE=; b=YPAO/bHbTjq1Sm6NWJD8vbC8leRKZZL/co7H4rMR+AnM+37r3oae3RMy+uH+OcA1rBYg8P 9WH4Y0Qvg9vKpEU8UWt0zuX1MiDJh76iM5kL9ogH3jbYSWZvadOzV5qsGOmc1Q0iB5Ocu5 CRije11Vqkq6KZB8MabZLVMumce5eJQ= Date: Tue, 07 Jul 2020 12:49:27 +0200 From: Paul Cercueil Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] remoteproc: Address runtime PM issues To: Mathieu Poirier Cc: ohad@wizery.com, bjorn.andersson@linaro.org, s-anna@ti.com, linux-remoteproc@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Message-Id: In-Reply-To: <20200630163118.3830422-1-mathieu.poirier@linaro.org> References: <20200630163118.3830422-1-mathieu.poirier@linaro.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi, Le mar. 30 juin 2020 =E0 10:31, Mathieu Poirier=20 a =E9crit : > This set follows the conversation that took place here[1] and provides > the "two small patches" I alluded to at the end of the thread. >=20 > Paul Cercueil: patch 1/2 is compile tested only - please see that it=20 > does what > you want. Still works fine, so Tested-by: Paul Cercueil for the patchset. Cheers, -Paul > Suman Anna: Please test on your side and confirm that it addresses=20 > the Omap > regression. >=20 > Applies on top of rproc-next (7dcef3988eed) >=20 > Thanks, > Mathieu >=20 > [1].=20 > https://lore.kernel.org/linux-remoteproc/20200515104340.10473-1-paul@crap= ouillou.net/T/#t >=20 > Mathieu Poirier (2): > remoteproc: ingenic: Move clock handling to prepare/unprepare > callbacks > Revert "remoteproc: Add support for runtime PM" >=20 > drivers/remoteproc/ingenic_rproc.c | 84=20 > +++++++++------------------- > drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c | 17 +----- > 2 files changed, 27 insertions(+), 74 deletions(-) >=20 > -- > 2.25.1 >=20