Received: by 2002:a05:6902:102b:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id x11csp975484ybt; Tue, 7 Jul 2020 05:01:40 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJxVUVv6RphkjdonvHiBBBYi4KGJtv6c6pRXTLTZIELzMklOAq0fI0QSuOO9ZcXiBpWT4IWS X-Received: by 2002:a17:906:f911:: with SMTP id lc17mr48909595ejb.330.1594123300038; Tue, 07 Jul 2020 05:01:40 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1594123300; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=pf8rbrYcDE2adAYqXKJVWsAT0+8gnseD7AX7FGffJ6ye6yzYD0iKPkeG8rdbXlbLfi CbcdnG5NQHiHi9/1lo/WGJQ/CEmLcRHe/tpknFiVSVg++81snU1k64794/q/41NNV4rt ilF+DRtOUOktrFMabLhHfhWIKGDFB6tq6sC/lry0QIu/oEY7C4XE/TtnQ3vO2NzBnSfI dzx4ugn/1X8yVzS1G9xzD+ewZnRri9r+LQR9ALMkNJjD9d6MlFI8dRMdSmunVFVyUr05 HcC0dWDnnXOOJBI6HxdDxVUHBIvzYL3fxWOAn7bbTjXzpSIAVTnjSGAkprc610nanjNO qWOA== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to :mime-version:user-agent:date:message-id:from:references:to:subject; bh=lCzowh/Jx1O38ywJ7nHeNXkZteP1FcaOwUVr8jwBtso=; b=Z4GnnGFbaPWuRJI5+BdOq1owi2b1mqvzFX8j3AYiBNX5YZkK1ZzhssIlWQGmdVo7o1 2dBIAcTYirpypmsZgyQPePR6t7O6XLiiHeAWxbDah+9iau+jqj1355GXqjzgfKIVKNdy ZN96gcIG8QTiBB0koZL8VOoIQVtPjsLpUIhi7XfwTBiroxmXkulq9oDnGgBnrhR+6hbu 0jCJEV5ed8i182tn7G2sC4wGfObbDjUdWhG4WL3wfuz4wvZ+L4RLY4E7+0pRIrK07Hn6 LT1m9HM6JebyG1IOc56GtUomTw13jF4JIXSHEhF0YFZFA9Laj7idAQ9wEDUb1wWiXWvq pLuA== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=alibaba.com Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [23.128.96.18]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id sd17si10051922ejb.423.2020.07.07.05.01.15; Tue, 07 Jul 2020 05:01:40 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=alibaba.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1727791AbgGGMAp (ORCPT + 99 others); Tue, 7 Jul 2020 08:00:45 -0400 Received: from out30-42.freemail.mail.aliyun.com ([115.124.30.42]:42670 "EHLO out30-42.freemail.mail.aliyun.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726900AbgGGMAp (ORCPT ); Tue, 7 Jul 2020 08:00:45 -0400 X-Alimail-AntiSpam: AC=PASS;BC=-1|-1;BR=01201311R161e4;CH=green;DM=||false|;DS=||;FP=0|-1|-1|-1|0|-1|-1|-1;HT=e01e07484;MF=alex.shi@linux.alibaba.com;NM=1;PH=DS;RN=17;SR=0;TI=SMTPD_---0U20KAQo_1594123241; Received: from IT-FVFX43SYHV2H.local(mailfrom:alex.shi@linux.alibaba.com fp:SMTPD_---0U20KAQo_1594123241) by smtp.aliyun-inc.com(127.0.0.1); Tue, 07 Jul 2020 20:00:42 +0800 Subject: Re: [PATCH v15 05/21] mm/thp: move lru_add_page_tail func to huge_memory.c To: akpm@linux-foundation.org, mgorman@techsingularity.net, tj@kernel.org, hughd@google.com, khlebnikov@yandex-team.ru, daniel.m.jordan@oracle.com, yang.shi@linux.alibaba.com, willy@infradead.org, hannes@cmpxchg.org, lkp@intel.com, linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, cgroups@vger.kernel.org, shakeelb@google.com, iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com, richard.weiyang@gmail.com, "Kirill A. Shutemov" References: <1594122412-28057-1-git-send-email-alex.shi@linux.alibaba.com> <1594122412-28057-6-git-send-email-alex.shi@linux.alibaba.com> From: Alex Shi Message-ID: <9fa2cf92-c4a0-02ca-1f02-7ef71952de18@linux.alibaba.com> Date: Tue, 7 Jul 2020 20:00:11 +0800 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.15; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.7.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <1594122412-28057-6-git-send-email-alex.shi@linux.alibaba.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=gbk Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org ?? 2020/7/7 ????7:46, Alex Shi ะด??: > > +static void lru_add_page_tail(struct page *page, struct page *page_tail, > + struct lruvec *lruvec, struct list_head *list) > +{ > + VM_BUG_ON_PAGE(!PageHead(page), page); > + VM_BUG_ON_PAGE(PageCompound(page_tail), page); > + VM_BUG_ON_PAGE(PageLRU(page_tail), page); > + lockdep_assert_held(&lruvec_pgdat(lruvec)->lru_lock); > + > + if (!list) > + SetPageLRU(page_tail); > + > + if (likely(PageLRU(page))) > + list_add_tail(&page_tail->lru, &page->lru); > + else if (list) { > + /* page reclaim is reclaiming a huge page */ > + get_page(page_tail); > + list_add_tail(&page_tail->lru, list); > + } else { > + /* > + * Head page has not yet been counted, as an hpage, > + * so we must account for each subpage individually. > + * > + * Put page_tail on the list at the correct position > + * so they all end up in order. > + */ > + add_page_to_lru_list_tail(page_tail, lruvec, > + page_lru(page_tail)); I missed some points for this function, since in the call chain: split_huge_page() to lru_add_page_tail, the head page's lru won't be set when !PageLRU(head). But the other page_tail are add to lru list here Is it ok for this situation? Thanks! Alex > + } > +}