Received: by 2002:a05:6902:102b:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id x11csp1026160ybt; Tue, 7 Jul 2020 06:12:17 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJya+t0hOWOjietnW5fqKUEFBVaLNKGPOxQmh6lT+XA3IBex2TmB6FLTvnKkLwNVUa5FcS0g X-Received: by 2002:a17:907:11db:: with SMTP id va27mr49590457ejb.175.1594127537457; Tue, 07 Jul 2020 06:12:17 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1594127537; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=k/NwduX3j+LQp0QL8fIbPX9pPYTd/97Wvij9a6bF05/6tKaGmsty1eIyYQM+iG62M2 oxUpnDBAl+cF1gRMIoIkWg8yh4brpah0NeMO9gklkEiyzXsACAq8wewBs4WoP1wuc41B sfFMmKCf+JsqzR7R3FOE9tjrNvwj8BdCsGzu1YaRrJEniZUepBSFGldwScx+6zqZxNC6 ckIMBTQu4yRCJ0cDp6PmAVvKJ/VG0BHRbzrNpN3O853h0691jt0MRSAXeVQ9EsDwoY3R kh6TYwdwNMz4FXKvwubKJ5Kz9f+FCsxcZhkfcpiwasxkXVUc8KoCN2GJhUA1SzjIpcJm 95RA== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:user-agent:in-reply-to :content-disposition:mime-version:references:message-id:subject:cc :to:from:date; bh=+DzWb+WnjUvUgHZQrxRxdgB6M95XNIuHrMUNgueKpUg=; b=Uqi1ZymqEsCCG6ZxiJQD7JK/VLrI+LwPztyFA1ZTBpJbQiIyVTnM6m1DbOTHwpYSZ7 u+6KKKyVDVUQIbgq5nUKhHuI1hqC5MyykIOpoPhjAayWKNqzNwsENIvB1/sYN6ePWBTD P9pOK/u2cPfu5XlIGjHkbWEqSjCojMhShK7iXA9PGmsBL4u1E2mXdwlVeEVqA4wYFpAr EmImYfWO4WDyFU37U+AGVDihJP+CjebGD1OyWFV/6Tg+EDZIPjNISdNWUZ/kf38WtGTs 25naMEX1v4vmwa0LsT6aVTT93bzonTInJvoptam3yiVdkIrvm4UnHQ9EjFiVqZHxOTxq QYKw== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [23.128.96.18]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id m15si14479680ejr.38.2020.07.07.06.11.52; Tue, 07 Jul 2020 06:12:17 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1727800AbgGGNLn (ORCPT + 99 others); Tue, 7 Jul 2020 09:11:43 -0400 Received: from foss.arm.com ([217.140.110.172]:48670 "EHLO foss.arm.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1725944AbgGGNLn (ORCPT ); Tue, 7 Jul 2020 09:11:43 -0400 Received: from usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (unknown [10.121.207.14]) by usa-sjc-mx-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A6C20C0A; Tue, 7 Jul 2020 06:11:42 -0700 (PDT) Received: from e107158-lin.cambridge.arm.com (e107158-lin.cambridge.arm.com [10.1.195.21]) by usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 068DC3F71E; Tue, 7 Jul 2020 06:11:40 -0700 (PDT) Date: Tue, 7 Jul 2020 14:11:38 +0100 From: Qais Yousef To: Vincent Guittot Cc: Ingo Molnar , Peter Zijlstra , Valentin Schneider , Juri Lelli , Dietmar Eggemann , Steven Rostedt , Ben Segall , Mel Gorman , Patrick Bellasi , Chris Redpath , Lukasz Luba , linux-kernel Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 0/2] sched: Optionally skip uclamp logic in fast path Message-ID: <20200707131138.ji7pyxltf342agf6@e107158-lin.cambridge.arm.com> References: <20200630112123.12076-1-qais.yousef@arm.com> <20200706104111.yfopcjm3kiqlxhx2@e107158-lin.cambridge.arm.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: NeoMutt/20171215 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 07/07/20 14:29, Vincent Guittot wrote: > On Mon, 6 Jul 2020 at 12:41, Qais Yousef wrote: > > > > On 07/03/20 14:09, Vincent Guittot wrote: > > > I have run the perf bench sched pipe that have have already run > > > previously with this v6 and the results are similar to my previous > > > tests: > > > The impact is -1.61% similarly to v2 which is better compared the > > > original -3.66% without your patch > > > > Thanks Vincent. > > > > Can you afford doing a capture of `perf record` and share the resulting > > perf.dat with vmlinux (with debug symbols)? > > Will try to make it by end of the week Thanks! If you want a place to drop them let me know. Cheers -- Qais Yousef > > > > > Having a before/after capture would be even better. > > > > Not sure if we can do much about this -1.61% in your case, but it'd be good to > > understand why if possible. perf bench sched pipe is very sensitive to tiniest > > of changes which could be due to binary-to-binary differences. > > > > Thanks > > > > -- > > Qais Yousef