Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18;
From:   Florian Weimer <fw@deneb.enyo.de>
To:     Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com>
Cc:     Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
        Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
        "Paul E . McKenney" <paulmck@linux.ibm.com>,
        Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@gmail.com>,
        "H . Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>, Paul Turner <pjt@google.com>,
        linux-api@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH for 5.8 0/4] rseq cpu_id ABI fix
References: <20200706204913.20347-1-mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com>
Date:   Tue, 07 Jul 2020 16:54:55 +0200
In-Reply-To: <20200706204913.20347-1-mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com> (Mathieu
        Desnoyers's message of "Mon, 6 Jul 2020 16:49:09 -0400")
Message-ID: <87tuyjxtmo.fsf@mid.deneb.enyo.de>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

I would like to point out that the subject is misleading: This is not
an ABI change.  It fixes the contents of the __rseq_abi TLS variable
(as glibc calls it), but that's it.

(Sorry, I should have mentioned this earlier.)